語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Teams and Organizing in the Digital ...
~
Ng Lane, Jacqueline.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Teams and Organizing in the Digital Age: How Team Networks Form and Why They Perform.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Teams and Organizing in the Digital Age: How Team Networks Form and Why They Perform./
作者:
Ng Lane, Jacqueline.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:
219 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International80-01A.
標題:
Management. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10817033
ISBN:
9780438116900
Teams and Organizing in the Digital Age: How Team Networks Form and Why They Perform.
Ng Lane, Jacqueline.
Teams and Organizing in the Digital Age: How Team Networks Form and Why They Perform.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 219 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01, Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2018.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
This dissertation explores the relationship between how teams form and what they need to perform. It adopts the perspective that technology is fundamental to organizing in modern workplaces and examines how technology may both enhance and constrain teamwork. By adopting this perspective, two questions naturally follow. First, how do teams organize using technologies? Second, how can technologies enable teams to organize effectively? Addressing these two questions are of utmost importance due to two recent trends in contemporary organizations. The first trend is the rise of teams in the workplace, whereby firms are reorganizing as team-based structures to promote agility and fluidity. A 2018 Deloitte report that surveyed over 11,000 businesses found that an astounding ninety-one percent of executives ranked redesigning their organizations as a "network of teams" their number one priority (Deloitte Insights, 2018). The second trend is the rise in social media use for internal communications within the workplace. Unlike external uses of social media that cross many public platforms (e.g., Facebook for social networking, Twitter for microblogging), most organizations implement an integrated social media platform for internal communications that contains several functions (Leonardi, Huysman, & Steinfield, 2013). These platforms are collectively referred to as enterprise social media or ESM and recent reports show that two-thirds of organizations are already using ESM for their internal communications and this percentage continues to grow (Bughin, 2015). Yet despite the growing adoption of ESM, organizational scholars have been slow to study their impact on organizing and teamwork. Hence, many of the opportunities that social media offers workers remains at the potential level rather than evidence based. These two trends not only reveal that organizations are replacing traditional hierarchical structures with flatter, team-based designs but also suggest that traditional approaches to studying work teams and technology may no longer be sufficient for understanding how teams function. Accordingly, this dissertation provides a new framework for understanding contemporary teams that specifically examines how teams naturally organize with technologies and subsequently, how technologies may enable teams to organize effectively. Towards this end, it adopts a social network approach to evaluate the structural signatures or network structures that emerge from team members' interactions. Chapter 1 introduces the framework for investigating team properties and phenomena in this dissertation: the team form-perform paradox . This paradox refers to the disconnect between what teams do and what they ought to do to be effective. In particular, the literature on teams over the past century of research has found that teams need certain enabling conditions (Hackman, 2012) that increase the odds that they are effective. These needs include features such as diverse composition or sharing unique information. Yet the features that research has found to be most important for team performance are often disincentivized by self-formation tendencies or default team behaviors that lead to unintended consequences when people team up together. Chapter 1 proposes that the team form-perform paradox is a useful lens for synthesizing the research on teams to date and proposes that studies on teams ought to consider both the self-formation tendencies and team performance requirements in tandem, rather than as distinct entities. Building on the team form-perform paradox framework introduced in Chapter 1, Chapters 2 through 4 explore how this lens can be used to first assess, and then improve team functioning. More specifically, Chapter 2 examines how team communication networks naturally form, and then explores how formal interventions or simple team messages can improve the effectiveness of communication in the context of online team discussions. This chapter finds that formal interventions aimed at structuring group process can be a useful way to help teams overcome some of their self-formation tendencies. Chapters 3 and 4 then explore how the design features of modern technologies, namely enterprise social media, alter the self-formation tendencies of teams. Essentially, ESM offers teams unprecedented opportunities for organizing, and it is possible that these capabilities may facilitate new ways for teams to communicate, interact, and collaborate that can help teams overcome their form-perform paradox. To better understand the nature of these new opportunities, Chapter 3 develops a conceptual model for examining how social media use impacts teams. It proposes that the teaming environment shapes how social media affordances are enacted to alter how teams carry out team processes. Affordances refer to the potential for new actions that are offered by the features of an object, such as a technology, and provides a useful lens for examining both the positive and negative consequences of social media use on teams. Lastly, Chapter 4 explores some of these new opportunities empirically by examining how team communication networks form on social media and how they perform. (Abstract shortened by ProQuest.).
ISBN: 9780438116900Subjects--Topical Terms:
516664
Management.
Teams and Organizing in the Digital Age: How Team Networks Form and Why They Perform.
LDR
:06400nmm a2200349 4500
001
2205564
005
20190828120316.5
008
201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9780438116900
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10817033
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)northwestern:14148
035
$a
AAI10817033
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Ng Lane, Jacqueline.
$3
3432425
245
1 0
$a
Teams and Organizing in the Digital Age: How Team Networks Form and Why They Perform.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2018
300
$a
219 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01, Section: A.
500
$a
Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500
$a
Contractor, Noshir S.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2018.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
This dissertation explores the relationship between how teams form and what they need to perform. It adopts the perspective that technology is fundamental to organizing in modern workplaces and examines how technology may both enhance and constrain teamwork. By adopting this perspective, two questions naturally follow. First, how do teams organize using technologies? Second, how can technologies enable teams to organize effectively? Addressing these two questions are of utmost importance due to two recent trends in contemporary organizations. The first trend is the rise of teams in the workplace, whereby firms are reorganizing as team-based structures to promote agility and fluidity. A 2018 Deloitte report that surveyed over 11,000 businesses found that an astounding ninety-one percent of executives ranked redesigning their organizations as a "network of teams" their number one priority (Deloitte Insights, 2018). The second trend is the rise in social media use for internal communications within the workplace. Unlike external uses of social media that cross many public platforms (e.g., Facebook for social networking, Twitter for microblogging), most organizations implement an integrated social media platform for internal communications that contains several functions (Leonardi, Huysman, & Steinfield, 2013). These platforms are collectively referred to as enterprise social media or ESM and recent reports show that two-thirds of organizations are already using ESM for their internal communications and this percentage continues to grow (Bughin, 2015). Yet despite the growing adoption of ESM, organizational scholars have been slow to study their impact on organizing and teamwork. Hence, many of the opportunities that social media offers workers remains at the potential level rather than evidence based. These two trends not only reveal that organizations are replacing traditional hierarchical structures with flatter, team-based designs but also suggest that traditional approaches to studying work teams and technology may no longer be sufficient for understanding how teams function. Accordingly, this dissertation provides a new framework for understanding contemporary teams that specifically examines how teams naturally organize with technologies and subsequently, how technologies may enable teams to organize effectively. Towards this end, it adopts a social network approach to evaluate the structural signatures or network structures that emerge from team members' interactions. Chapter 1 introduces the framework for investigating team properties and phenomena in this dissertation: the team form-perform paradox . This paradox refers to the disconnect between what teams do and what they ought to do to be effective. In particular, the literature on teams over the past century of research has found that teams need certain enabling conditions (Hackman, 2012) that increase the odds that they are effective. These needs include features such as diverse composition or sharing unique information. Yet the features that research has found to be most important for team performance are often disincentivized by self-formation tendencies or default team behaviors that lead to unintended consequences when people team up together. Chapter 1 proposes that the team form-perform paradox is a useful lens for synthesizing the research on teams to date and proposes that studies on teams ought to consider both the self-formation tendencies and team performance requirements in tandem, rather than as distinct entities. Building on the team form-perform paradox framework introduced in Chapter 1, Chapters 2 through 4 explore how this lens can be used to first assess, and then improve team functioning. More specifically, Chapter 2 examines how team communication networks naturally form, and then explores how formal interventions or simple team messages can improve the effectiveness of communication in the context of online team discussions. This chapter finds that formal interventions aimed at structuring group process can be a useful way to help teams overcome some of their self-formation tendencies. Chapters 3 and 4 then explore how the design features of modern technologies, namely enterprise social media, alter the self-formation tendencies of teams. Essentially, ESM offers teams unprecedented opportunities for organizing, and it is possible that these capabilities may facilitate new ways for teams to communicate, interact, and collaborate that can help teams overcome their form-perform paradox. To better understand the nature of these new opportunities, Chapter 3 develops a conceptual model for examining how social media use impacts teams. It proposes that the teaming environment shapes how social media affordances are enacted to alter how teams carry out team processes. Affordances refer to the potential for new actions that are offered by the features of an object, such as a technology, and provides a useful lens for examining both the positive and negative consequences of social media use on teams. Lastly, Chapter 4 explores some of these new opportunities empirically by examining how team communication networks form on social media and how they perform. (Abstract shortened by ProQuest.).
590
$a
School code: 0163.
650
4
$a
Management.
$3
516664
650
4
$a
Communication.
$3
524709
650
4
$a
Information Technology.
$3
1030799
650
4
$a
Organizational behavior.
$3
516683
690
$a
0454
690
$a
0459
690
$a
0489
690
$a
0703
710
2
$a
Northwestern University.
$b
Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences.
$3
1023502
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
80-01A.
790
$a
0163
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2018
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10817033
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9382113
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入