東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Validity and Constitutionality of in...

Emmons Kelly, Helen Kathryn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Validity and Constitutionality of inter parte Reviews before the U.S. Supreme Court.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Validity and Constitutionality of inter parte Reviews before the U.S. Supreme Court./
作者:	Emmons Kelly, Helen Kathryn.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	40 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-06(E).
標題:	Public administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10816773
ISBN:	9780355975666

Validity and Constitutionality of inter parte Reviews before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Emmons Kelly, Helen Kathryn.

Validity and Constitutionality of inter parte Reviews before the U.S. Supreme Court. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 40 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.

Thesis (M.P.A.)--Eastern Kentucky University, 2018.

For 400 years, courts have adjudicated disputes between private parties about the validity of patents. Inventors apply for patents to an administrative agency. Patent examiners review the application to determine whether or not an idea is valid to have a patent issued. Patent examiners are people and sometimes errors are made. An administrative agency must have an administrative avenue to review a potential error. Six years ago, Congress created a review with the implementation of inter parte reviews. An argument before the U.S. Supreme Court looks at whether or not Inter partes review violate Article III of the U.S. Constitution. A case analysis of Oil States v. Green's Energy Group, et al. will show that more likely than not correcting an error of an administrative agency is not in violation of one's constitutional right to a jury. Permitting the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to correct its own errors in light of subsequent clarifications in the law allows for an efficient course-correction that improves the quality of individual patents and benefits the patent system generally.

ISBN: 9780355975666Subjects--Topical Terms:

531287
Public administration.

Validity and Constitutionality of inter parte Reviews before the U.S. Supreme Court.
LDR:02064nmm a2200313 4500 001 2205202
005 20190717110304.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355975666
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10816773
035 $a (MiAaPQ)eku:10908
035 $a AAI10816773
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Emmons Kelly, Helen Kathryn. $3 3432069
245 1 0 $a Validity and Constitutionality of inter parte Reviews before the U.S. Supreme Court.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 40 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.
500 $a Advisers: Anne Cizmar; LeAnn Beaty.
502 $a Thesis (M.P.A.)--Eastern Kentucky University, 2018.
520 $a For 400 years, courts have adjudicated disputes between private parties about the validity of patents. Inventors apply for patents to an administrative agency. Patent examiners review the application to determine whether or not an idea is valid to have a patent issued. Patent examiners are people and sometimes errors are made. An administrative agency must have an administrative avenue to review a potential error. Six years ago, Congress created a review with the implementation of inter parte reviews. An argument before the U.S. Supreme Court looks at whether or not Inter partes review violate Article III of the U.S. Constitution. A case analysis of Oil States v. Green's Energy Group, et al. will show that more likely than not correcting an error of an administrative agency is not in violation of one's constitutional right to a jury. Permitting the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to correct its own errors in light of subsequent clarifications in the law allows for an efficient course-correction that improves the quality of individual patents and benefits the patent system generally.
590 $a School code: 1576.
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0513
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a Eastern Kentucky University. $b Government. $3 3428169
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-06(E).
790 $a 1576
791 $a M.P.A.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10816773