東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An Examination of the Effectiveness ...

Zhang, Xin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Examination of the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback on Chinese University Students' English Writing Performance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Examination of the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback on Chinese University Students' English Writing Performance./
作者:	Zhang, Xin.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	173 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-12A(E).
標題:	Education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10746664
ISBN:	9780438267046

An Examination of the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback on Chinese University Students' English Writing Performance.
Zhang, Xin.

An Examination of the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback on Chinese University Students' English Writing Performance. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 173 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oakland University, 2018.

Effective writing pedagogy in higher education has been a consistent goal of researchers and instructors in the English as a second / foreign language writing practices. Formative peer feedback, a key factor in pedagogical writing practices, has been receiving growing interest (Hu & Lam, 2010). While much remains unknown regarding how the quality of peer feedback and back-feedback affects students' writing performance, this quantitative study adopted a quasi-experimental control group design to investigate primary pedagogical effects of peer feedback on university students' writing performance in an EFL context.

ISBN: 9780438267046Subjects--Topical Terms:

516579
Education.

An Examination of the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback on Chinese University Students' English Writing Performance.
LDR:02703nmm a2200325 4500 001 2204897
005 20190718114217.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438267046
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10746664
035 $a (MiAaPQ)oakland:10058
035 $a AAI10746664
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Zhang, Xin. $3 996620
245 1 3 $a An Examination of the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback on Chinese University Students' English Writing Performance.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 173 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: John E. McEneaney.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oakland University, 2018.
520 $a Effective writing pedagogy in higher education has been a consistent goal of researchers and instructors in the English as a second / foreign language writing practices. Formative peer feedback, a key factor in pedagogical writing practices, has been receiving growing interest (Hu & Lam, 2010). While much remains unknown regarding how the quality of peer feedback and back-feedback affects students' writing performance, this quantitative study adopted a quasi-experimental control group design to investigate primary pedagogical effects of peer feedback on university students' writing performance in an EFL context.
520 $a A total of 198 sophomores majoring in English took part in a 15-week research study. A one-way repeated measures ANCOVA analysis was conducted to examine the comparative effect between the traditional and peer feedback groups. The result revealed that beginning with slightly different writing ability, the peer feedback group significantly made more growth in writing achievement than the traditional feedback group. Further analysis through hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that both the quality of students' feedback and the quality of students' back-feedback were significant predictors of students' writing performance. Additionally, the quality of students' back-feedback had a slightly larger impact than that of the quality of students' feedback.
520 $a This study provides not only further evidence of the power of formative peer feedback as an effective tool to maximize learning, but also recommends the inclusion of it in the university curriculum to encourage students to direct and monitor their own learning processes and be life-long learners.
590 $a School code: 0446.
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a Oakland University. $b Education. $3 3265883
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-12A(E).
790 $a 0446
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10746664