東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Causal Comparative Analysis of Mat...

Lowery, LaRonda.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Causal Comparative Analysis of Mathematics Self-Efficacy of Face-to-Face and Online Quantitative Literacy Students.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Causal Comparative Analysis of Mathematics Self-Efficacy of Face-to-Face and Online Quantitative Literacy Students./
作者:	Lowery, LaRonda.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	119 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-12B(E).
標題:	Mathematics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10837480
ISBN:	9780438270282

A Causal Comparative Analysis of Mathematics Self-Efficacy of Face-to-Face and Online Quantitative Literacy Students.
Lowery, LaRonda.

A Causal Comparative Analysis of Mathematics Self-Efficacy of Face-to-Face and Online Quantitative Literacy Students. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 119 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Liberty University, 2018.

Mathematics self-efficacy has been shown to be a strong predictor of mathematics performance and mixed results have been found when examining the mathematics self-efficacy of face-to-face students based on gender and age. However, there is a lack of research studies that examine if differences exist in the mathematics self-efficacy of face-to-face and online students. The purpose of this ex-post facto causal comparative quantitative study was to determine if differences existed in the mathematics self-efficacy of Quantitative Literacy students, as measured by the Mathematics Self-Efficacy Scale, based on their choice of delivery method (face-to-face or online). Participants for this research study were comprised of select face-to-face and online Quantitative Literacy students at seven North Carolina community colleges. Data were examined using a one-way multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) and a statistically significant difference was found in the mathematics task self-efficacy and math-related school subjects' self-efficacy of students who enrolled in a face-to-face or online Quantitative Literacy course. Online Quantitative Literacy students possessed both a higher mathematics task self-efficacy and math-related school subjects' self-efficacy. Additional data analyses revealed no statistically significant differences in the mathematics self-efficacy of Quantitative Literacy students based on gender and method of placement (high school multiple measures, placement test scores, and developmental mathematics course completion).

ISBN: 9780438270282Subjects--Topical Terms:

515831
Mathematics.

A Causal Comparative Analysis of Mathematics Self-Efficacy of Face-to-Face and Online Quantitative Literacy Students.
LDR:02573nmm a2200313 4500 001 2204709
005 20190709113043.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438270282
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10837480
035 $a (MiAaPQ)liberty:12305
035 $a AAI10837480
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lowery, LaRonda. $3 3431578
245 1 2 $a A Causal Comparative Analysis of Mathematics Self-Efficacy of Face-to-Face and Online Quantitative Literacy Students.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 119 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Christopher Clark.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Liberty University, 2018.
520 $a Mathematics self-efficacy has been shown to be a strong predictor of mathematics performance and mixed results have been found when examining the mathematics self-efficacy of face-to-face students based on gender and age. However, there is a lack of research studies that examine if differences exist in the mathematics self-efficacy of face-to-face and online students. The purpose of this ex-post facto causal comparative quantitative study was to determine if differences existed in the mathematics self-efficacy of Quantitative Literacy students, as measured by the Mathematics Self-Efficacy Scale, based on their choice of delivery method (face-to-face or online). Participants for this research study were comprised of select face-to-face and online Quantitative Literacy students at seven North Carolina community colleges. Data were examined using a one-way multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) and a statistically significant difference was found in the mathematics task self-efficacy and math-related school subjects' self-efficacy of students who enrolled in a face-to-face or online Quantitative Literacy course. Online Quantitative Literacy students possessed both a higher mathematics task self-efficacy and math-related school subjects' self-efficacy. Additional data analyses revealed no statistically significant differences in the mathematics self-efficacy of Quantitative Literacy students based on gender and method of placement (high school multiple measures, placement test scores, and developmental mathematics course completion).
590 $a School code: 1052.
650 4 $a Mathematics. $3 515831
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
650 4 $a Community college education. $3 2122836
690 $a 0405
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0275
710 2 $a Liberty University. $b School of Education. $3 1017771
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-12B(E).
790 $a 1052
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10837480