東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Domestic Effects of Federal Regulati...

Gmeiner, Robert.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Domestic Effects of Federal Regulation of Oil and Gas Industries.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Domestic Effects of Federal Regulation of Oil and Gas Industries./
作者:	Gmeiner, Robert.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	260 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-01A(E).
標題:	Economics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10684775
ISBN:	9780438305342

Domestic Effects of Federal Regulation of Oil and Gas Industries.
Gmeiner, Robert.

Domestic Effects of Federal Regulation of Oil and Gas Industries. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 260 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2018.

The capture theory of regulation concludes that regulatory agencies tend to be captured by the firms they are regulating, so that regulations benefit those regulated firms. This paper examines the cumulative effects of federal regulations on the oil and gas industry and finds that regulations have benefited the more powerful economic interests in that industry, consistent with the capture theory. Regulations have tended to narrow refiners' margins and are associated with positive return and negative volatility responses for stocks of vertically integrated firms, which are the largest players in the industry. This narrowing of margins is mostly a long-term effect, but has some short run effects more on input prices than output prices, further benefiting vertically integrated firms. Refining regulations affect input prices more than output prices primarily by affecting demand for certain types of crude oil. Effects of regulation on input prices and even relative quantities of different inputs are robust, whereas effects of regulation on output prices are far more tenuous. There is no clear evidence that consumers are worse off because of the regulatory environment, but the robust empirical evidence does indicate that the regulatory environment differentially benefits large vertically integrated producers.

ISBN: 9780438305342Subjects--Topical Terms:

517137
Economics.

Domestic Effects of Federal Regulation of Oil and Gas Industries.
LDR:02285nmm a2200313 4500 001 2203873
005 20190624102604.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438305342
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10684775
035 $a (MiAaPQ)fsu:14287
035 $a AAI10684775
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gmeiner, Robert. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-7470-6167 $3 3430692
245 1 0 $a Domestic Effects of Federal Regulation of Oil and Gas Industries.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 260 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Randall Holcombe.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2018.
520 $a The capture theory of regulation concludes that regulatory agencies tend to be captured by the firms they are regulating, so that regulations benefit those regulated firms. This paper examines the cumulative effects of federal regulations on the oil and gas industry and finds that regulations have benefited the more powerful economic interests in that industry, consistent with the capture theory. Regulations have tended to narrow refiners' margins and are associated with positive return and negative volatility responses for stocks of vertically integrated firms, which are the largest players in the industry. This narrowing of margins is mostly a long-term effect, but has some short run effects more on input prices than output prices, further benefiting vertically integrated firms. Refining regulations affect input prices more than output prices primarily by affecting demand for certain types of crude oil. Effects of regulation on input prices and even relative quantities of different inputs are robust, whereas effects of regulation on output prices are far more tenuous. There is no clear evidence that consumers are worse off because of the regulatory environment, but the robust empirical evidence does indicate that the regulatory environment differentially benefits large vertically integrated producers.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a Economics. $3 517137
650 4 $a Agricultural economics. $3 3172150
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0503
690 $a 0630
710 2 $a The Florida State University. $b Economics. $3 3172919
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-01A(E).
790 $a 0071
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10684775