東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Equity and Outcome Gaps in Texas fol...

Reach, Jacob Pearson.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Equity and Outcome Gaps in Texas following House Bill 1 (2011).

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Equity and Outcome Gaps in Texas following House Bill 1 (2011)./
Author:	Reach, Jacob Pearson.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	142 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-08A(E).
Subject:	Educational leadership. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13811956
ISBN:	9781392053034

Equity and Outcome Gaps in Texas following House Bill 1 (2011).
Reach, Jacob Pearson.

Equity and Outcome Gaps in Texas following House Bill 1 (2011). - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 142 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northeastern University, 2019.

The purpose of this study was to determine how equity changed following Texas House Bill 1 (2011) and whether the change in equity correlated with a change in standardized test scores. The major research question was to determine whether school funding correlates to changes with student outcomes in reading and math. Using the equity framework of school finance, this study looked at how horizontal equity and fiscal neutrality changed during an 8-year period from 2009 to 2016. The equity measures were then compared to reading and math scores on a nationally administrated standardized test for students in fourth grade. The study found that although equity and funding decreased immediately after changes in state law in 2011, per-pupil spending increased surpassing 2009 amounts and equity increased. Most of these increases came from an increased share of local funding through property taxes, which increased as property value across Texas also increased, despite decreased federal and state funding. Recommendations include continuing to research ways to measure changes of equity and compare those changes to student outcomes to better evaluate school finance systems. This study did not reveal a connection between equity and outcomes but provided greater understanding on how equity did change in Texas, which can help led to better policy decisions when developing state funding systems for public education in the future.

ISBN: 9781392053034Subjects--Topical Terms:

529436
Educational leadership.

Equity and Outcome Gaps in Texas following House Bill 1 (2011).
LDR:02405nmm a2200325 4500 001 2203795
005 20190606091703.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392053034
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13811956
035 $a (MiAaPQ)nucps:11134
035 $a AAI13811956
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Reach, Jacob Pearson. $3 3430604
245 1 0 $a Equity and Outcome Gaps in Texas following House Bill 1 (2011).
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 142 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Kelly Conn.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northeastern University, 2019.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to determine how equity changed following Texas House Bill 1 (2011) and whether the change in equity correlated with a change in standardized test scores. The major research question was to determine whether school funding correlates to changes with student outcomes in reading and math. Using the equity framework of school finance, this study looked at how horizontal equity and fiscal neutrality changed during an 8-year period from 2009 to 2016. The equity measures were then compared to reading and math scores on a nationally administrated standardized test for students in fourth grade. The study found that although equity and funding decreased immediately after changes in state law in 2011, per-pupil spending increased surpassing 2009 amounts and equity increased. Most of these increases came from an increased share of local funding through property taxes, which increased as property value across Texas also increased, despite decreased federal and state funding. Recommendations include continuing to research ways to measure changes of equity and compare those changes to student outcomes to better evaluate school finance systems. This study did not reveal a connection between equity and outcomes but provided greater understanding on how equity did change in Texas, which can help led to better policy decisions when developing state funding systems for public education in the future.
590 $a School code: 0160.
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Education finance. $3 3172165
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0277
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a Northeastern University. $b Education. $3 2097072
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-08A(E).
790 $a 0160
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13811956