東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Software of the Oppressed: Reprogram...

Glass, Erin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Software of the Oppressed: Reprogramming the Invisible Discipline.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Software of the Oppressed: Reprogramming the Invisible Discipline./
作者:	Glass, Erin.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	379 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-03A(E).
標題:	Educational technology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10937051
ISBN:	9780438508569

Software of the Oppressed: Reprogramming the Invisible Discipline.
Glass, Erin.

Software of the Oppressed: Reprogramming the Invisible Discipline. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 379 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2018.

This dissertation offers a critical analysis of software practices within the university and the ways they contribute to a broader status quo of software use, development, and imagination. Through analyzing the history of software practices used in the production and circulation of student and scholarly writing, I argue that this overarching software status quo has oppressive qualities in that it supports the production of passive users, or users who are unable to collectively understand and transform software code for their own interests. I also argue that the university inadvertently normalizes and strengthens the software status quo through what I call its "invisible discipline," or the conditioning of its community---particularly students, but also faculty, librarians, staff, and other university members---to have little expectation of being able to participate in the governance or development of the software used in their academic settings. This invisible discipline not only fails to prepare students for the political struggles and practical needs of our digital age (while increasing the social divide between those who program digital technology and those who must passively accept it), but reinforces a lack of awareness of how digital technology powerfully mediates the production, circulation, and reception of knowledge at individual and collective levels. Through this analysis, I hope to show what a liberatory approach to academic technology practices might look like, as well as demonstrate---through a variety of alternative software practices in and beyond the university---the intellectual, political, and social contributions these practices might contribute to higher education and scholarly knowledge production at large. I conclude the dissertation with suggestions for "reprogramming" iv our academic technology practices, an approach that I also explored in practice in the production of this dissertation. As I describe in the Afterword, the genesis of this dissertation, as well as the production, revision, and dissemination of its drafts, were generated as part of two digital projects, Social Paper and #SocialDiss, each of which attempted in their own small way to resist the invisible discipline and the ways that conventional academic technology practices structure intellectual work. The goal of this dissertation and its related digital projects is thus to help shine light on the exciting intellectual and political potential of democratizing software development and governance in and through educational institutions.

ISBN: 9780438508569Subjects--Topical Terms:

517670
Educational technology.

Software of the Oppressed: Reprogramming the Invisible Discipline.
LDR:03577nmm a2200337 4500 001 2203646
005 20190531105742.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438508569
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10937051
035 $a (MiAaPQ)minarees:15238
035 $a AAI10937051
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Glass, Erin. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-6880-481X $3 3430450
245 1 0 $a Software of the Oppressed: Reprogramming the Invisible Discipline.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 379 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Matthew K. Gold.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2018.
520 $a This dissertation offers a critical analysis of software practices within the university and the ways they contribute to a broader status quo of software use, development, and imagination. Through analyzing the history of software practices used in the production and circulation of student and scholarly writing, I argue that this overarching software status quo has oppressive qualities in that it supports the production of passive users, or users who are unable to collectively understand and transform software code for their own interests. I also argue that the university inadvertently normalizes and strengthens the software status quo through what I call its "invisible discipline," or the conditioning of its community---particularly students, but also faculty, librarians, staff, and other university members---to have little expectation of being able to participate in the governance or development of the software used in their academic settings. This invisible discipline not only fails to prepare students for the political struggles and practical needs of our digital age (while increasing the social divide between those who program digital technology and those who must passively accept it), but reinforces a lack of awareness of how digital technology powerfully mediates the production, circulation, and reception of knowledge at individual and collective levels. Through this analysis, I hope to show what a liberatory approach to academic technology practices might look like, as well as demonstrate---through a variety of alternative software practices in and beyond the university---the intellectual, political, and social contributions these practices might contribute to higher education and scholarly knowledge production at large. I conclude the dissertation with suggestions for "reprogramming" iv our academic technology practices, an approach that I also explored in practice in the production of this dissertation. As I describe in the Afterword, the genesis of this dissertation, as well as the production, revision, and dissemination of its drafts, were generated as part of two digital projects, Social Paper and #SocialDiss, each of which attempted in their own small way to resist the invisible discipline and the ways that conventional academic technology practices structure intellectual work. The goal of this dissertation and its related digital projects is thus to help shine light on the exciting intellectual and political potential of democratizing software development and governance in and through educational institutions.
590 $a School code: 0046.
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a City University of New York. $b English. $3 1020275
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-03A(E).
790 $a 0046
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10937051