東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Group Prenatal Care and Social Deter...

Parker-Shames, Simon.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Group Prenatal Care and Social Determinants of Health: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Group Prenatal Care and Social Determinants of Health: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Federally Qualified Health Center./
作者:	Parker-Shames, Simon.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	43 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-04(E).
標題:	Public health. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10688583
ISBN:	9780355621365

Group Prenatal Care and Social Determinants of Health: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Federally Qualified Health Center.
Parker-Shames, Simon.

Group Prenatal Care and Social Determinants of Health: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Federally Qualified Health Center. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 43 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-04.

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2017.

Objective: Group prenatal care (GPC) models are increasingly a focus of observational studies of birth outcomes, yet there are limited data on the socio-demographic and health characteristics of women who elect GPC compared to traditional primary care (TPC). The purpose of this study was to identify and describe potential differences in pregnancy characteristics, social determinants of health (SDOH), prenatal complications, and behavioral risk factors between women who elect GPC compared to TPC in a Federally Qualified Health Clinic (FQHC) setting.

ISBN: 9780355621365Subjects--Topical Terms:

534748
Public health.

Group Prenatal Care and Social Determinants of Health: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Federally Qualified Health Center.
LDR:03517nmm a2200325 4500 001 2203137
005 20190528072649.5
008 201008s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355621365
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10688583
035 $a (MiAaPQ)washington:18197
035 $a AAI10688583
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Parker-Shames, Simon. $3 3429928
245 1 0 $a Group Prenatal Care and Social Determinants of Health: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Federally Qualified Health Center.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 43 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-04.
500 $a Adviser: Ian Painter.
502 $a Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2017.
520 $a Objective: Group prenatal care (GPC) models are increasingly a focus of observational studies of birth outcomes, yet there are limited data on the socio-demographic and health characteristics of women who elect GPC compared to traditional primary care (TPC). The purpose of this study was to identify and describe potential differences in pregnancy characteristics, social determinants of health (SDOH), prenatal complications, and behavioral risk factors between women who elect GPC compared to TPC in a Federally Qualified Health Clinic (FQHC) setting.
520 $a Study Design: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of women who elected GPC compared to those who elected TPC, from a group of 2,376 patients entering prenatal care at the study site between 2011 and 2017. Cohort composition was examined with regards to pregnancy characteristics, social determinants of health (SDOH), behavioral risk factors, and diagnosis of medical complications during prenatal care. Variables were compared between cohorts using bivariate statistics, stratified by trimester at intake in order to compare women who entered prenatal care at similar gestational ages.
520 $a Results: In the 1st trimester stratum, GPC was associated with 0.7 fewer prior pregnancies (P<0.001), 8.7% lower rate of Hispanic ethnicity (P=0.010), 5.7% higher rate of private insurance (P=0.043), 0.3 fewer people per family (P=0.013), and an average of 1.1 more years of education (P=0.031). GPC was associated with a higher rate of diagnosis with the following complications: 18.8% higher rate of anemia (P<0.001), 9.0% higher rate of uterine size-complicating pregnancy (P=0.001), a 7.6% higher rate of "other not elsewhere classified" complications (P=0.024). GPC was also associated with a 12.4% higher rate of parental alcohol or drug abuse (P=0.028), and, of those who reported illicit drug use, 2.4 fewer uses per week were reported (P<0.001). Conclusion: GPC and TPC cohorts differed significantly terms of pregnancy characteristics, SDOH, prenatal complications, and behavioral risk factors. The GPC cohort tended to have some indicators of higher socioeconomic status (SES), yet were more likely to be diagnosed with a complication or behavioral risk factor. These differences could be expected to influence the outcome findings of observational studies on GPC. Further research examining the maternal characteristics of subjects who elect GPC compared to TPC is recommended to confirm these findings and further explore the dynamics involved.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
650 4 $a Obstetrics. $3 634501
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0380
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Health Services. $3 3182498
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-04(E).
790 $a 0250
791 $a Master's
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10688583