東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Key Concepts of Organizational Chang...

Unger, Cai.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Key Concepts of Organizational Change - A Bibliometric Network Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Key Concepts of Organizational Change - A Bibliometric Network Analysis./
作者:	Unger, Cai.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	64 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-03A(E).
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10643261
ISBN:	9780355488616

Key Concepts of Organizational Change - A Bibliometric Network Analysis.
Unger, Cai.

Key Concepts of Organizational Change - A Bibliometric Network Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 64 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--University of South Alabama, 2017.

The field of Organizational Change has seen a proliferation of publications of all sorts over the past two decades. In view of the emerging breadth of the field, it is becoming increasingly difficult for practitioners and researchers alike to separate the wheat from the chaff. At the same time, research suggests the majority of Organizational Change efforts are not successful. It is therefore my intent to map the nomological structure of the field of Organizational Change, determine the most dominating concepts, and identify any patterns or trends.

ISBN: 9780355488616Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

Key Concepts of Organizational Change - A Bibliometric Network Analysis.
LDR:03095nmm a2200349 4500 001 2202243
005 20190513114645.5
008 201008s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355488616
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10643261
035 $a (MiAaPQ)southalabama:10550
035 $a AAI10643261
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Unger, Cai. $3 3428990
245 1 0 $a Key Concepts of Organizational Change - A Bibliometric Network Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 64 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Donald C. Mosley.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--University of South Alabama, 2017.
520 $a The field of Organizational Change has seen a proliferation of publications of all sorts over the past two decades. In view of the emerging breadth of the field, it is becoming increasingly difficult for practitioners and researchers alike to separate the wheat from the chaff. At the same time, research suggests the majority of Organizational Change efforts are not successful. It is therefore my intent to map the nomological structure of the field of Organizational Change, determine the most dominating concepts, and identify any patterns or trends.
520 $a For that purpose I have collected bibliometric data from 1948 to 2016 and conduct a network analysis based on co-occurrence of keywords of Organizational Change.
520 $a My network analysis suggests five major findings. First, the field of Organizational Change has reached a level of maturity, which reduces the likelihood of breakthrough innovations. Second, only five concepts are dominating the field of Organizational Change today, which I label the "Top Five": Change management, leadership, organizational culture, organizational learning, and innovation. Third, we are barking up the wrong tree, which means there is an inherent inconsistency between the topicality of the field, i.e. the dominance of very few topics, and the low success rate of Organizational Change projects. Fourth, it is still unclear how to exactly define and reliably measure change. Finally fifth, there seems to be too much focus on the paradigm that change is always preferably over an equilibrium.
520 $a I therefore propose three suggestions for further research. First, look beyond the Top Five concepts and create more dissonant discussion within the field, including a critical review of established paradigms. Second, revisit the established definitions and measurements of change, which includes questioning the widespread assumption that the majority of change efforts are failing. Finally third, conduct a network analysis based on a network of social actors of the field of organizational change, i.e. authors of organizational change.
590 $a School code: 0491.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
650 4 $a Organization theory. $3 2122787
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0635
710 2 $a University of South Alabama. $b Mitchell College of Business. $3 3349919
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-03A(E).
790 $a 0491
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10643261