東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Daily Writing in the Content Areas: ...

Carter, Hannah M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Daily Writing in the Content Areas: A Look at How Secondary Teachers Explain Their Experiences with Writing Integration.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Daily Writing in the Content Areas: A Look at How Secondary Teachers Explain Their Experiences with Writing Integration./
作者:	Carter, Hannah M.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	199 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-12A(E).
標題:	Teacher education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10816571
ISBN:	9780438171923

Daily Writing in the Content Areas: A Look at How Secondary Teachers Explain Their Experiences with Writing Integration.
Carter, Hannah M.

Daily Writing in the Content Areas: A Look at How Secondary Teachers Explain Their Experiences with Writing Integration. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 199 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nevada, Reno, 2018.

Examinations of adolescent literacy practice over the last 10 years have illuminated the significance of an integrated approach to literacy and content area instruction (Bean, 2000; Applebee & Langer, 2013; IRA, 2012). Considering writing specifically, writing in the content areas has positively impacted both students' writing quality and their disciplinary understandings (Graham & Perin, 2007). Despite this, recent years have not shown increases in writing time or depth in the secondary classroom (Applebee & Langer, 2011a; Gilbert & Graham, 2010).

ISBN: 9780438171923Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172312
Teacher education.

Daily Writing in the Content Areas: A Look at How Secondary Teachers Explain Their Experiences with Writing Integration.
LDR:03209nmm a2200337 4500 001 2201853
005 20190503132005.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438171923
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10816571
035 $a (MiAaPQ)unr:12574
035 $a AAI10816571
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Carter, Hannah M. $3 3428587
245 1 0 $a Daily Writing in the Content Areas: A Look at How Secondary Teachers Explain Their Experiences with Writing Integration.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 199 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Dianna Townsend.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nevada, Reno, 2018.
520 $a Examinations of adolescent literacy practice over the last 10 years have illuminated the significance of an integrated approach to literacy and content area instruction (Bean, 2000; Applebee & Langer, 2013; IRA, 2012). Considering writing specifically, writing in the content areas has positively impacted both students' writing quality and their disciplinary understandings (Graham & Perin, 2007). Despite this, recent years have not shown increases in writing time or depth in the secondary classroom (Applebee & Langer, 2011a; Gilbert & Graham, 2010).
520 $a Using a multicase study design (Yin, 2014) informed by sociocultural theory (Vygotsky, 1978) and zone theory (Goos, 2005), this study explored commonalities across the reflections of teachers who integrate writing daily. Four secondary teachers participated in the study, one from each primary content area. Collected over one academic quarter (10 weeks and approximately 50 instructional days), multiple data sources provided an in-depth look at each case---initial meeting notes, surveys, instructional logs, written reflections, journal prompts, observation protocols, and interview transcripts. A four-phase iterative process to thematic analysis was employed to find patterns and relationships among the four teachers' experiences with writing integration, as well as constraints and affordances related to writing integration and sustainment (Merriam, 1998; Stake, 2006).
520 $a Findings revealed that teachers who integrate daily writing valued the student benefits of writing integration---independence on writing tasks, disciplinary understanding, and future preparation. The teachers also faced various challenges related to writing integration, which involved both internal conflicts and instructional dilemmas. Lastly, the teachers recognized the pedagogical benefits of writing integration, including better understanding their students' learning processes and planning instruction more attentively. Dismantling dichotomies related to literacy in the content areas, teachers negotiated the seemingly productive tensions around writing integration and prioritized their students in their decision making.
590 $a School code: 0139.
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 3172312
650 4 $a Secondary education. $3 2122779
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0533
690 $a 0279
710 2 $a University of Nevada, Reno. $b Educational Specialties. $3 1044680
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-12A(E).
790 $a 0139
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10816571