東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Legislative Action---Not Further Jud...

Hrozenchik, Mark William.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Legislative Action---Not Further Judicial Action---is Required to Correct the Determination of Patentable Subject Matter in Regard to 35 U.S.C. § 101.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Legislative Action---Not Further Judicial Action---is Required to Correct the Determination of Patentable Subject Matter in Regard to 35 U.S.C. § 101./
作者:	Hrozenchik, Mark William.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	192 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-05(E).
標題:	Patent law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10793374
ISBN:	9780355882292

Legislative Action---Not Further Judicial Action---is Required to Correct the Determination of Patentable Subject Matter in Regard to 35 U.S.C. § 101.
Hrozenchik, Mark William.

Legislative Action---Not Further Judicial Action---is Required to Correct the Determination of Patentable Subject Matter in Regard to 35 U.S.C. § 101. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 192 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-05.

Thesis (LL.M.)--The George Washington University, 2018.

The purpose of this Paper is twofold: First, to explore the somewhat contradictory, and perhaps convoluted approaches by the Supreme Court and Federal Circuit to patentable subject matter since the early 1970's to the present; and Second, to investigate two theories of how to fix---if it can be considered to be broken---the current state of the law regarding patent eligibility. In regard to the second aspect, it is the Thesis of this Paper that the only practicable solution to the current quagmire is a legislative approach that will correct the legal definition of patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

ISBN: 9780355882292Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168356
Patent law.

Legislative Action---Not Further Judicial Action---is Required to Correct the Determination of Patentable Subject Matter in Regard to 35 U.S.C. § 101.
LDR:02480nmm a2200313 4500 001 2200170
005 20181214114500.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355882292
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10793374
035 $a (MiAaPQ)gwu:14168
035 $a AAI10793374
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hrozenchik, Mark William. $3 3426918
245 1 0 $a Legislative Action---Not Further Judicial Action---is Required to Correct the Determination of Patentable Subject Matter in Regard to 35 U.S.C. § 101.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 192 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-05.
500 $a Adviser: Hank R. Molinengo.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--The George Washington University, 2018.
520 $a The purpose of this Paper is twofold: First, to explore the somewhat contradictory, and perhaps convoluted approaches by the Supreme Court and Federal Circuit to patentable subject matter since the early 1970's to the present; and Second, to investigate two theories of how to fix---if it can be considered to be broken---the current state of the law regarding patent eligibility. In regard to the second aspect, it is the Thesis of this Paper that the only practicable solution to the current quagmire is a legislative approach that will correct the legal definition of patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
520 $a In addition, it has become common, since the decision of Alice and others to state "software patents are dead." This is not even remotely true. What has happened, as will be discussed, is that because of the expansion of the definition of the abstract idea exemption of patentable subject matter, it has become increasingly difficult---sometimes impossible---to get patents awarded for certain technology areas. One reason for this is because so-called abstract idea innovations can be best expressed in terms of algorithms and in software. Consequently, software patents have achieved a negative reputation---sort of a "guilt by association" narrative. The truly unfortunate result---the unintended consequence - is that perhaps many applications for innovations have either not been filed, or have been unfairly rejected and abandoned.
590 $a School code: 0075.
650 4 $a Patent law. $3 3168356
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
690 $a 0562
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Intellectual Property Law. $3 1679989
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-05(E).
790 $a 0075
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10793374