東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Exploring the Selection of Organizat...

Chambers, Bridgette-Gregory.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring the Selection of Organizational Learning Inputs in a US Based Services Firm.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploring the Selection of Organizational Learning Inputs in a US Based Services Firm./
作者:	Chambers, Bridgette-Gregory.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	117 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-08A(E).
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10747469
ISBN:	9780355770179

Exploring the Selection of Organizational Learning Inputs in a US Based Services Firm.
Chambers, Bridgette-Gregory.

Exploring the Selection of Organizational Learning Inputs in a US Based Services Firm. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 117 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--Northcentral University, 2018.

Customers demand more of businesses. Obstacles to satisfying customer demand abound. Market fluctuations, volatility, and uncertainty combine with the speed of technology, competitive threats, and talent constraints, to challenge company leaders at the helm of their organization with the goal of navigating obstacles and operating with a competitive advantage. The problem examined herein involved the overlooked connection between innovation, learning, and knowledge. Without holistic understanding the connection between knowledge and innovation/competitiveness, organizational leaders unknowingly left spend, productivity, and innovation at risk, and thus, their assets underutilized. To contribute to solving this issue, this qualitative, single case study, conducted with a US-based software-services firm, focused on the identification of vital components needed to form an Organizational Learning Inputs (OLI) framework, which is the framework necessary to guide the selection of content essential to sustain ongoing learning initiatives that the firm deems necessary to support strategic plans and innovation, thought to impact the overall competitiveness or success of the firm. The development of an OLI framework concentrated on filling a knowledge gap that previously hindered a holistic understanding of Organizational Learning (OL) and the relationship to competitiveness and innovation. In anticipation of a new or elaborated theory, the research design included grounded theory and case study methods designed to answer research questions and provide a baseline of qualitative data where little existed. The results of the analysis provided an initial description of the most significant components and process utilized to determine OLI. Moreover, results supported an elaboration of 4I and 5I OL frameworks. Themes observed that inform and unified the OLI process included strategy, innovation, productivity, compliance, and tacit knowledge v. explicit knowledge. Application of the findings in practice or research provides a path to connect the interplay of knowledge, learning, and innovation. This interplay is critical, as it leads to improved competitiveness for the firm. Future research should exploit the opportunity to develop new or elaboration of theory and frameworks.

ISBN: 9780355770179Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

Exploring the Selection of Organizational Learning Inputs in a US Based Services Firm.
LDR:03283nmm a2200313 4500 001 2166192
005 20181203094032.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355770179
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10747469
035 $a (MiAaPQ)northcentral:12759
035 $a AAI10747469
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chambers, Bridgette-Gregory. $3 3354295
245 1 0 $a Exploring the Selection of Organizational Learning Inputs in a US Based Services Firm.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 117 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jama Bradley.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--Northcentral University, 2018.
520 $a Customers demand more of businesses. Obstacles to satisfying customer demand abound. Market fluctuations, volatility, and uncertainty combine with the speed of technology, competitive threats, and talent constraints, to challenge company leaders at the helm of their organization with the goal of navigating obstacles and operating with a competitive advantage. The problem examined herein involved the overlooked connection between innovation, learning, and knowledge. Without holistic understanding the connection between knowledge and innovation/competitiveness, organizational leaders unknowingly left spend, productivity, and innovation at risk, and thus, their assets underutilized. To contribute to solving this issue, this qualitative, single case study, conducted with a US-based software-services firm, focused on the identification of vital components needed to form an Organizational Learning Inputs (OLI) framework, which is the framework necessary to guide the selection of content essential to sustain ongoing learning initiatives that the firm deems necessary to support strategic plans and innovation, thought to impact the overall competitiveness or success of the firm. The development of an OLI framework concentrated on filling a knowledge gap that previously hindered a holistic understanding of Organizational Learning (OL) and the relationship to competitiveness and innovation. In anticipation of a new or elaborated theory, the research design included grounded theory and case study methods designed to answer research questions and provide a baseline of qualitative data where little existed. The results of the analysis provided an initial description of the most significant components and process utilized to determine OLI. Moreover, results supported an elaboration of 4I and 5I OL frameworks. Themes observed that inform and unified the OLI process included strategy, innovation, productivity, compliance, and tacit knowledge v. explicit knowledge. Application of the findings in practice or research provides a path to connect the interplay of knowledge, learning, and innovation. This interplay is critical, as it leads to improved competitiveness for the firm. Future research should exploit the opportunity to develop new or elaboration of theory and frameworks.
590 $a School code: 1443.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Business education. $3 543396
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 3168311
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0688
690 $a 0310
710 2 $a Northcentral University. $b Business and Technology Management. $3 2100236
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-08A(E).
790 $a 1443
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10747469