東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Towards a cultural psychology of rel...

Cortez, Neil Andrew C.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Towards a cultural psychology of religion: Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Towards a cultural psychology of religion: Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity./
作者:	Cortez, Neil Andrew C.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	109 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-01B(E).
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3721026
ISBN:	9781339021966

Towards a cultural psychology of religion: Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity.
Cortez, Neil Andrew C.

Towards a cultural psychology of religion: Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 109 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology, 2015.

Current psychological research into religiosity can be located into two paradigms: the cross-cultural psychology interpretive tradition and the cultural psychology interpretive tradition. To generate support for the latter paradigm, American and Mainland Chinese respondents were asked to describe a religious or spiritual other as a way of exploring the impact of individualism-collectivism cultural values on expressions of religiosity. Statements from Chinese respondents were expected to have more socially related content compared to American respondents. Responses were analyzed using a linguistic analysis computer program with attention given to social process, family, friends, and humans content. Raters were also instructed to generate categories based on the content of the responses. No significant differences were found between American and Mainland Chinese respondents on all four content categories. Religious self-rating was found to significantly predict family content, while religious and spiritual self-ratings significantly predicted humans content. Raters also generated 11 categories from American responses, and 10 categories from Mainland Chinese responses. Methodological and theoretical implications are also discussed.

ISBN: 9781339021966Subjects--Topical Terms:

524863
Clinical psychology.

Towards a cultural psychology of religion: Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity.
LDR:02304nmm a2200325 4500 001 2166067
005 20181203094032.5
008 190424s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339021966
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3721026
035 $a (MiAaPQ)fuller.psych:10119
035 $a AAI3721026
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cortez, Neil Andrew C. $3 3354172
245 1 0 $a Towards a cultural psychology of religion: Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 109 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Alvin C. Dueck.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology, 2015.
520 $a Current psychological research into religiosity can be located into two paradigms: the cross-cultural psychology interpretive tradition and the cultural psychology interpretive tradition. To generate support for the latter paradigm, American and Mainland Chinese respondents were asked to describe a religious or spiritual other as a way of exploring the impact of individualism-collectivism cultural values on expressions of religiosity. Statements from Chinese respondents were expected to have more socially related content compared to American respondents. Responses were analyzed using a linguistic analysis computer program with attention given to social process, family, friends, and humans content. Raters were also instructed to generate categories based on the content of the responses. No significant differences were found between American and Mainland Chinese respondents on all four content categories. Religious self-rating was found to significantly predict family content, while religious and spiritual self-ratings significantly predicted humans content. Raters also generated 11 categories from American responses, and 10 categories from Mainland Chinese responses. Methodological and theoretical implications are also discussed.
590 $a School code: 0371.
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Religion. $3 516493
650 4 $a Cultural anthropology. $3 2122764
650 4 $a Spirituality. $3 534780
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0318
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0647
710 2 $a Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology. $b Clinical Psychology. $3 2098857
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-01B(E).
790 $a 0371
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3721026