東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Analyzing Measurements of Housing Af...

Cai, Zi.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Analyzing Measurements of Housing Affordability.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Analyzing Measurements of Housing Affordability./
Author:	Cai, Zi.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
Description:	65 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-06(E).
Subject:	Urban planning. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264924
ISBN:	9780355119336

Analyzing Measurements of Housing Affordability.
Cai, Zi.

Analyzing Measurements of Housing Affordability. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 65 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2017.

Measuring housing affordability is a key challenge for most communities. Traditionally, the 30 percent rent-income ratio has been the cornerstone of housing affordability policies. Recently, however, a number of researchers have recommended new affordability measures. Given the complexity of determining realistic housing affordability, identifying the best and most appropriate measure is a challenge. This thesis is the first research attempt to develop a comprehensive methodological framework for the comparative assessment of commonly used housing affordability indicators. Six housing affordability measures were selected for analysis: NAR Housing Affordability Index, HUD Guideline, Amenity-Based Housing Affordability Index, H+T Affordability Index, Shelter Poverty Measure, and Self-Sufficiency Standard. These measures were compared in terms of their underlying standards, data accuracy, and comprehensiveness. Specific indicators for each of the three components were developed and applied to the six housing affordability indicators. Detailed analysis of the collected data revealed that the Self-Sufficiency Standard measure is the best measure of housing affordability among the six indicators analyzed. This measure outranks each of the other measures on all three dimensions of comparison. Therefore, it is recommended that local planners, stakeholders, and policymakers adopt the Self-Sufficiency Standard to assess housing affordability outcomes.

ISBN: 9780355119336Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122922
Urban planning.

Analyzing Measurements of Housing Affordability.
LDR:02369nmm a2200301 4500 001 2165824
005 20181129124500.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355119336
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10264924
035 $a (MiAaPQ)washington:16966
035 $a AAI10264924
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cai, Zi. $3 3353917
245 1 0 $a Analyzing Measurements of Housing Affordability.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 65 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.
500 $a Adviser: Himanshu Grover.
502 $a Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2017.
520 $a Measuring housing affordability is a key challenge for most communities. Traditionally, the 30 percent rent-income ratio has been the cornerstone of housing affordability policies. Recently, however, a number of researchers have recommended new affordability measures. Given the complexity of determining realistic housing affordability, identifying the best and most appropriate measure is a challenge. This thesis is the first research attempt to develop a comprehensive methodological framework for the comparative assessment of commonly used housing affordability indicators. Six housing affordability measures were selected for analysis: NAR Housing Affordability Index, HUD Guideline, Amenity-Based Housing Affordability Index, H+T Affordability Index, Shelter Poverty Measure, and Self-Sufficiency Standard. These measures were compared in terms of their underlying standards, data accuracy, and comprehensiveness. Specific indicators for each of the three components were developed and applied to the six housing affordability indicators. Detailed analysis of the collected data revealed that the Self-Sufficiency Standard measure is the best measure of housing affordability among the six indicators analyzed. This measure outranks each of the other measures on all three dimensions of comparison. Therefore, it is recommended that local planners, stakeholders, and policymakers adopt the Self-Sufficiency Standard to assess housing affordability outcomes.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
650 4 $a Home economics. $3 551902
690 $a 0999
690 $a 0386
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Urban Design and Planning. $3 2101304
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-06(E).
790 $a 0250
791 $a Master's
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264924