東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Developing and Testing a K-12 Engine...

Jones, Tamecia Raishaun.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Developing and Testing a K-12 Engineering Epistemic Frame to Uncover Engineering in the Interactions of a High School Summer Session.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Developing and Testing a K-12 Engineering Epistemic Frame to Uncover Engineering in the Interactions of a High School Summer Session./
作者:	Jones, Tamecia Raishaun.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	183 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-10B(E).
標題:	Engineering. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10790842
ISBN:	9780438017832

Developing and Testing a K-12 Engineering Epistemic Frame to Uncover Engineering in the Interactions of a High School Summer Session.
Jones, Tamecia Raishaun.

Developing and Testing a K-12 Engineering Epistemic Frame to Uncover Engineering in the Interactions of a High School Summer Session. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 183 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 2018.

Educational reform has expanded K-12 standards to include engineering. Not only will K-12 teachers have to be trained to teach engineering concepts, but assessments must evolve to reflect the various aspects of engineering. Engineering as a profession is expressed via multiple dimensions of an epistemic frame, such as skills, knowledge, identity, values, and epistemology, but many of these elements are not measured in K-12 formal and informal spaces. In a summer session of a college preparatory program, a research project revealed that although students had design journals, storyboards, and traditional assessments, the in situ video recordings captured decisions, evolution of projects, and rich interactions between students that were not assessed. This dissertation describes the development of a K-12 engineering epistemic frame that incorporates local standards, policy outcomes, and national directives to capture skills, knowledge, identity, values, and epistemologies of engineering. The project then capitalized on the video data to investigate what kinds of engineering and design knowledge could be identified and assessed from brainstorm sessions and studio critiques. It further investigated how Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) might reveal aspects of the engineering epistemic frame. Network models were generated for the class, project groups, and individual students. Over half of the students displayed all aspects of the engineering epistemic frame, some students displayed many of the elements of the epistemic frame, and three students exhibited no elements of the epistemic frame. The engineering epistemic frame was then analyzed to show how it could complement Next Generation Science Standards. In summary, the engineering epistemic frame was an effective tool for viewing learning in situ, and brainstorm sessions and studio critiques are spaces where engineering knowledge occurs.

ISBN: 9780438017832Subjects--Topical Terms:

586835
Engineering.

Developing and Testing a K-12 Engineering Epistemic Frame to Uncover Engineering in the Interactions of a High School Summer Session.
LDR:02937nmm a2200313 4500 001 2165801
005 20181130083526.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438017832
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10790842
035 $a (MiAaPQ)purdue:22475
035 $a AAI10790842
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jones, Tamecia Raishaun. $3 3353891
245 1 0 $a Developing and Testing a K-12 Engineering Epistemic Frame to Uncover Engineering in the Interactions of a High School Summer Session.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 183 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Monica E. Cardella.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 2018.
520 $a Educational reform has expanded K-12 standards to include engineering. Not only will K-12 teachers have to be trained to teach engineering concepts, but assessments must evolve to reflect the various aspects of engineering. Engineering as a profession is expressed via multiple dimensions of an epistemic frame, such as skills, knowledge, identity, values, and epistemology, but many of these elements are not measured in K-12 formal and informal spaces. In a summer session of a college preparatory program, a research project revealed that although students had design journals, storyboards, and traditional assessments, the in situ video recordings captured decisions, evolution of projects, and rich interactions between students that were not assessed. This dissertation describes the development of a K-12 engineering epistemic frame that incorporates local standards, policy outcomes, and national directives to capture skills, knowledge, identity, values, and epistemologies of engineering. The project then capitalized on the video data to investigate what kinds of engineering and design knowledge could be identified and assessed from brainstorm sessions and studio critiques. It further investigated how Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) might reveal aspects of the engineering epistemic frame. Network models were generated for the class, project groups, and individual students. Over half of the students displayed all aspects of the engineering epistemic frame, some students displayed many of the elements of the epistemic frame, and three students exhibited no elements of the epistemic frame. The engineering epistemic frame was then analyzed to show how it could complement Next Generation Science Standards. In summary, the engineering epistemic frame was an effective tool for viewing learning in situ, and brainstorm sessions and studio critiques are spaces where engineering knowledge occurs.
590 $a School code: 0183.
650 4 $a Engineering. $3 586835
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Secondary education. $3 2122779
690 $a 0537
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0533
710 2 $a Purdue University. $b Engineering Education. $3 1026602
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-10B(E).
790 $a 0183
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10790842