東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Privatized Youth Sports: Are Youth B...

Cassidy, Glenn Joseph.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Privatized Youth Sports: Are Youth Being Left Behind.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Privatized Youth Sports: Are Youth Being Left Behind./
作者:	Cassidy, Glenn Joseph.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	180 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-08A(E).
標題:	Physical education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10801764
ISBN:	9780355794397

Privatized Youth Sports: Are Youth Being Left Behind.
Cassidy, Glenn Joseph.

Privatized Youth Sports: Are Youth Being Left Behind. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 180 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies, 2018.

A change is happening in the world of youth sports (Ripley, 2013; Longman, 2015; Fitzgerald 2013; Bowen & Hitt, 2013). Privatized youth sport teams, also known as club teams, have grown in number, size, and influence. Increasingly, high school age athletes are being forced to choose between their school team and their club team. While popular news outlets have reported on this change (Ripley, 2013; Fitzgerald, 2013), there has been no academic review of this particular phenomenon. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to compare the experiences of students participating in school-based and club-based athletics in order to better understand opportunities and potential disparities/inequalities between these two approaches to athletics. The identification-commitment model (Marsh & Kleitman) and the social inequality gap reduction model (Marsh & Kleitman, 2002) served as the lenses through which data was analyzed. Coaches, Parents, and Student-Athletes were individually interviewed or participated in focus groups. Three major findings emerged. First, winning and losing have taken on different meanings between high school and club teams. Second, athletes on both high school and club teams were able to develop a form of social capital (Coleman, 1987), however, only high school athletes saw an associated academic benefit. Finally, whereas high school athletes were able to participate with little monetary investment, the costs associated with club teams were very high and access to financial assistance was either not available or was not well-known. Implications of these findings and general recommendations as well as recommendations for parents, athletes, high school, and club officials are discussed.

ISBN: 9780355794397Subjects--Topical Terms:

635343
Physical education.

Privatized Youth Sports: Are Youth Being Left Behind.
LDR:02664nmm a2200289 4500 001 2165641
005 20181129115904.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355794397
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10801764
035 $a (MiAaPQ)rutgersnb:8546
035 $a AAI10801764
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cassidy, Glenn Joseph. $3 3353728
245 1 0 $a Privatized Youth Sports: Are Youth Being Left Behind.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 180 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies, 2018.
520 $a A change is happening in the world of youth sports (Ripley, 2013; Longman, 2015; Fitzgerald 2013; Bowen & Hitt, 2013). Privatized youth sport teams, also known as club teams, have grown in number, size, and influence. Increasingly, high school age athletes are being forced to choose between their school team and their club team. While popular news outlets have reported on this change (Ripley, 2013; Fitzgerald, 2013), there has been no academic review of this particular phenomenon. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to compare the experiences of students participating in school-based and club-based athletics in order to better understand opportunities and potential disparities/inequalities between these two approaches to athletics. The identification-commitment model (Marsh & Kleitman) and the social inequality gap reduction model (Marsh & Kleitman, 2002) served as the lenses through which data was analyzed. Coaches, Parents, and Student-Athletes were individually interviewed or participated in focus groups. Three major findings emerged. First, winning and losing have taken on different meanings between high school and club teams. Second, athletes on both high school and club teams were able to develop a form of social capital (Coleman, 1987), however, only high school athletes saw an associated academic benefit. Finally, whereas high school athletes were able to participate with little monetary investment, the costs associated with club teams were very high and access to financial assistance was either not available or was not well-known. Implications of these findings and general recommendations as well as recommendations for parents, athletes, high school, and club officials are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0190.
650 4 $a Physical education. $3 635343
650 4 $a Sports Management. $3 2122869
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0430
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies. $b Education. $3 3353729
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-08A(E).
790 $a 0190
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10801764