東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An Evaluation of the HealthMatters(T...

Abbott, Jo Ann.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Evaluation of the HealthMatters(TM) Program: Health Promotion for People with Disabilities.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Evaluation of the HealthMatters(TM) Program: Health Promotion for People with Disabilities./
作者:	Abbott, Jo Ann.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	141 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-09B(E).
標題:	Nursing. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10276889
ISBN:	9781369756883

An Evaluation of the HealthMatters(TM) Program: Health Promotion for People with Disabilities.
Abbott, Jo Ann.

An Evaluation of the HealthMatters(TM) Program: Health Promotion for People with Disabilities. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 141 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: B.

Thesis (D.N.P.)--Wilmington University (Delaware), 2017.

Regular physical activity results in health benefits that include reducing the risks for chronic medical conditions such as type 2 diabetes. In adults with a disability, 40% are inactive compared to only 19% without a disability in one state. To address this disparity, a pilot HealthMatters(TM) Program (Pilot), an evidence-based health promotion program developed specifically for adults with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities (IDD), was implemented and retrospectively studied. The PICOT question developed for this Project was: for participating adults with IDD (Population) attending a community day program, how did the implementation of HealthMatters(TM) Pilot intervention (I) compare (C) to HealthMatters(TM) Program design with respect to process-oriented outcome (O) measures for this 12-week (T) Pilot? Curriculum, attendance, primary care providers (PCP) responses to Pilot participation notifications, participants' weight/BMI and blood pressures were retrospectively analyzed. Pilot costs and survey tools were applied after completion of the Curriculum. Ten (10) participants, and their primary providers, participated in the HealthMatters(TM) Pilot with 80% and 100% participation rates, respectively. Process-oriented measures focused on participation (reach), fidelity, context and costs of the implementation process. The Pilot's process strengths included high participation and survey satisfaction with Curriculum and training, relatively low costs and concordant fidelity of the Pilot's implementation compared with the HealthMatters(TM) Program. Opportunities identified included both favorable cost-value projections favoring future statewide implementation of HealthMatters(TM) Programs and potential for organizational growth to sustain health promotion goals.

ISBN: 9781369756883Subjects--Topical Terms:

528444
Nursing.

An Evaluation of the HealthMatters(TM) Program: Health Promotion for People with Disabilities.
LDR:02818nmm a2200313 4500 001 2165398
005 20181130083352.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369756883
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10276889
035 $a (MiAaPQ)wilmu:10588
035 $a AAI10276889
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Abbott, Jo Ann. $3 3353474
245 1 3 $a An Evaluation of the HealthMatters(TM) Program: Health Promotion for People with Disabilities.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 141 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Joanne F. Fletcher; Aaron M. Sebach.
502 $a Thesis (D.N.P.)--Wilmington University (Delaware), 2017.
520 $a Regular physical activity results in health benefits that include reducing the risks for chronic medical conditions such as type 2 diabetes. In adults with a disability, 40% are inactive compared to only 19% without a disability in one state. To address this disparity, a pilot HealthMatters(TM) Program (Pilot), an evidence-based health promotion program developed specifically for adults with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities (IDD), was implemented and retrospectively studied. The PICOT question developed for this Project was: for participating adults with IDD (Population) attending a community day program, how did the implementation of HealthMatters(TM) Pilot intervention (I) compare (C) to HealthMatters(TM) Program design with respect to process-oriented outcome (O) measures for this 12-week (T) Pilot? Curriculum, attendance, primary care providers (PCP) responses to Pilot participation notifications, participants' weight/BMI and blood pressures were retrospectively analyzed. Pilot costs and survey tools were applied after completion of the Curriculum. Ten (10) participants, and their primary providers, participated in the HealthMatters(TM) Pilot with 80% and 100% participation rates, respectively. Process-oriented measures focused on participation (reach), fidelity, context and costs of the implementation process. The Pilot's process strengths included high participation and survey satisfaction with Curriculum and training, relatively low costs and concordant fidelity of the Pilot's implementation compared with the HealthMatters(TM) Program. Opportunities identified included both favorable cost-value projections favoring future statewide implementation of HealthMatters(TM) Programs and potential for organizational growth to sustain health promotion goals.
590 $a School code: 1517.
650 4 $a Nursing. $3 528444
650 4 $a Health education. $3 559086
650 4 $a Nutrition. $3 517777
690 $a 0569
690 $a 0680
690 $a 0570
710 2 $a Wilmington University (Delaware). $b College of Health Professions. $3 3190343
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-09B(E).
790 $a 1517
791 $a D.N.P.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10276889