東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How ...

Hocevar, Kristin Page.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health./
作者:	Hocevar, Kristin Page.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	193 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-12A(E).
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10599924
ISBN:	9780355271348

Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health.
Hocevar, Kristin Page.

Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 193 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2017.

Health information is increasingly being shared online not just by credentialed sources such as physicians or health organizations, but also by patients with personal experience with a health concern. This dissertation proposes a new measure of vigilance-avoidance, or tendency to approach or avoid threatening stimuli, in order to understand how individual differences in this personality characteristic might influence selection and processing of online information about health. Two online experiments focusing on the topic of breast cancer were conducted to explore how individual levels of vigilance-avoidance moderate the effects of health message threat, community endorsement (e.g., online recommendations), and source type (patient- or physician-generated information) on selective exposure, perceptions of credibility, and helpfulness ratings. Results of these studies indicate that vigilance-avoidance interacts with these source, message, and community characteristics to influence both online health information selection behaviors and evaluations of online health information.

ISBN: 9780355271348Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.

Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health.
LDR:03156nmm a2200337 4500 001 2164286
005 20181106104111.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355271348
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10599924
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucsb:13463
035 $a AAI10599924
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hocevar, Kristin Page. $3 2096209
245 1 0 $a Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 193 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Andrew J. Flanagin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2017.
520 $a Health information is increasingly being shared online not just by credentialed sources such as physicians or health organizations, but also by patients with personal experience with a health concern. This dissertation proposes a new measure of vigilance-avoidance, or tendency to approach or avoid threatening stimuli, in order to understand how individual differences in this personality characteristic might influence selection and processing of online information about health. Two online experiments focusing on the topic of breast cancer were conducted to explore how individual levels of vigilance-avoidance moderate the effects of health message threat, community endorsement (e.g., online recommendations), and source type (patient- or physician-generated information) on selective exposure, perceptions of credibility, and helpfulness ratings. Results of these studies indicate that vigilance-avoidance interacts with these source, message, and community characteristics to influence both online health information selection behaviors and evaluations of online health information.
520 $a Women who are more vigilant spend more time reading threatening health information and evaluate it as more credible than women who are more avoidant, suggesting that they may be more likely to find health information more credible simply because it is negative. Additionally, women who are more avoidant spend more time reading low threat information than high threat information. Women who are more avoidant also spend even less time looking at credible health information from a physician than they do information from a patient, suggesting that when allowed to selectively expose themselves to information, they may miss key messages from credentialed medical sources that are important to their overall health. Overall, results from these studies suggest that our tendency to approach or avoid health information, as well as our potential to trust and find it credible, are dependent on these key personality characteristics---a novel contribution in the areas of health, selective exposure, and information evaluation research.
590 $a School code: 0035.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Health education. $3 559086
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0680
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a University of California, Santa Barbara. $b Communication. $3 1273533
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-12A(E).
790 $a 0035
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10599924