東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Acquisition of Obligatory and Va...

Lustres, Eduardo.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Acquisition of Obligatory and Variable Subjunctive Mood Selection in Temporal and Concessive Clauses in Heritage and L2 Spanish.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Acquisition of Obligatory and Variable Subjunctive Mood Selection in Temporal and Concessive Clauses in Heritage and L2 Spanish./
作者:	Lustres, Eduardo.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	115 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-06(E).
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10793712
ISBN:	9780438010512

The Acquisition of Obligatory and Variable Subjunctive Mood Selection in Temporal and Concessive Clauses in Heritage and L2 Spanish.
Lustres, Eduardo.

The Acquisition of Obligatory and Variable Subjunctive Mood Selection in Temporal and Concessive Clauses in Heritage and L2 Spanish. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 115 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.

Thesis (M.A.)--Purdue University, 2018.

The current study examines the acquisition of the obligatory and variable subjunctive mood selection in epistemic adverbial clauses by L2 learners and heritage speakers (HSs) of Spanish. The acquisition of the Spanish subjunctive shows significant variability among both L2 learners (e.g., Borgonovo, Bruhn de Garavito, & Prevost, 2008; Sanchez-Naranjo, 2009) and heritage speakers of Spanish (e.g., Potowski, Jegerski, & Morgan-Short, 2009). Several studies comparing L2 learners and heritage speakers show that heritage speakers outperform L2 learners at low and intermediate levels (e.g., Montrul & Perpinan, 2011). Some studies claim that differences between HSs and L2 learners can be explained because they exhibit different levels of exposure to Spanish at home during childhood (e.g., Mikulski, 2010) and in a classroom setting (e.g., Montrul & Perpinan, 2011). Regarding the type of selection, some researchers have argued interface vulnerability effects in the acquisition of variable subjunctive selection in both L2 learners (e.g., Massery & Fuentes, 2014) and heritage speakers (e.g., Montrul, 2007, 2009). A limitation of these studies is that they have compared obligatory selection in deontic modal bases vs. variable selection in epistemic modal bases. Perez-Cortes (2016) examined subjunctive selection within the deontic modality and found no differences between obligatory and variable selection. No previous work, however, has examined the acquisition of variable and obligatory epistemic predicates by HSs.

ISBN: 9780438010512Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.

The Acquisition of Obligatory and Variable Subjunctive Mood Selection in Temporal and Concessive Clauses in Heritage and L2 Spanish.
LDR:04129nmm a2200313 4500 001 2164154
005 20181030085011.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438010512
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10793712
035 $a (MiAaPQ)purdue:22633
035 $a AAI10793712
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lustres, Eduardo. $3 3352194
245 1 4 $a The Acquisition of Obligatory and Variable Subjunctive Mood Selection in Temporal and Concessive Clauses in Heritage and L2 Spanish.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 115 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.
500 $a Adviser: Alejandro Cuza-Blanco.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Purdue University, 2018.
520 $a The current study examines the acquisition of the obligatory and variable subjunctive mood selection in epistemic adverbial clauses by L2 learners and heritage speakers (HSs) of Spanish. The acquisition of the Spanish subjunctive shows significant variability among both L2 learners (e.g., Borgonovo, Bruhn de Garavito, & Prevost, 2008; Sanchez-Naranjo, 2009) and heritage speakers of Spanish (e.g., Potowski, Jegerski, & Morgan-Short, 2009). Several studies comparing L2 learners and heritage speakers show that heritage speakers outperform L2 learners at low and intermediate levels (e.g., Montrul & Perpinan, 2011). Some studies claim that differences between HSs and L2 learners can be explained because they exhibit different levels of exposure to Spanish at home during childhood (e.g., Mikulski, 2010) and in a classroom setting (e.g., Montrul & Perpinan, 2011). Regarding the type of selection, some researchers have argued interface vulnerability effects in the acquisition of variable subjunctive selection in both L2 learners (e.g., Massery & Fuentes, 2014) and heritage speakers (e.g., Montrul, 2007, 2009). A limitation of these studies is that they have compared obligatory selection in deontic modal bases vs. variable selection in epistemic modal bases. Perez-Cortes (2016) examined subjunctive selection within the deontic modality and found no differences between obligatory and variable selection. No previous work, however, has examined the acquisition of variable and obligatory epistemic predicates by HSs.
520 $a The present study covers this gap in the literature by examining present subjunctive (PRES SUB) and imperfect subjunctive (IMP SUB) in (a) temporal adverbial clauses with cuando ('when') and antes de que ('before'), and (b) concessive adverbial clauses with aunque ('although') and aun a riesgo de que ('even at the risk of'). Twenty HSs of Spanish (n=20; age range 16-22; M=19.3; SD=1.5), twenty English-speaking L2 learners (n=20; age range 18-22; M=19.65; SD=1.09) and twenty controls from Guanajuato, Mexico control group (n=20; age range 18-28; M=21.0; SD=2.3) completed a sentence completion task (SCT) (e.g., Cuza & Lopez Otero, 2016), an acceptability judgment task (AJT) (e.g., Perez-Cortes, 2016), a forced preference task (FPT) (e.g., Cuza & Frank, 2014; Sanchez-Naranjo, 2009), a language background questionnaire (e.g., Cuza, 2013) and a modified version of the DELE proficiency test (e.g., Cuza, Perez-Leroux & Sanchez, 2013; Montrul & Slabakova, 2003). Results from the SCT, the AJT and the FPT showed that overall the two experimental groups were outperformed by the control group across all conditions. The L2 group was outperformed by the HSs group in the SCT and in the grammatical sentences of the AJT. When it comes to differences between different types of selection, no significant differences were found between obligatory and variable selection of the subjunctive mood. Results are discussed in terms of age of effects (e.g., Curtiss, 1989; Lenneberg, 1967; Johnson & Newport, 1989) and vulnerability at the syntax-semantics interface (e.g., Sorace, 2000; Sorace & Filiaci, 2006).
590 $a School code: 0183.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Sociolinguistics. $3 524467
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0636
710 2 $a Purdue University. $b Languages and Cultures. $3 2094857
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-06(E).
790 $a 0183
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10793712