東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Nationalism, secularism, belonging, ...

Ulus, Huseyin Ekrem.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk./
作者:	Ulus, Huseyin Ekrem.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	241 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-08A(E).
標題:	Comparative literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10584712
ISBN:	9781369634730

Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk.
Ulus, Huseyin Ekrem.

Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 241 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2017.

This dissertation examines nationalism, secularism, and identity issues in the works of three controversial writers of the late 20th and early 21st centuries: Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk. Through a comparative analysis of the theory and literature on national, religious and secular belonging, this study aims to clarify the function of metafiction as a literary technique, the novel as a genre, literature as a medium that questions, shapes or endorses identities, and Comparative Literature as a discipline that creates a link between theory and literary works. This study challenges one-sided and uncritical accounts of nationalism, secularism, and identity. I argue that, in direct or indirect dialogue with theory, the novels of Roth, Rushdie, and Pamuk all question forms of exclusivism in national, religious, and secular forms of belonging. This is shown through their use of metafiction and other literary devices that serve to engage in self-reflexivity. The examination of this literary production leads me to make explicit ways in which the forms of the novel and literature not only help to question forms of exclusion, but also are instrumental in calling for new, alternative, and non-exclusivist forms, definitions and possibilities of co-existence.

ISBN: 9781369634730Subjects--Topical Terms:

570001
Comparative literature.

Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk.
LDR:02361nmm a2200337 4500 001 2163483
005 20181022132813.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369634730
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10584712
035 $a (MiAaPQ)rutgersnb:7842
035 $a AAI10584712
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ulus, Huseyin Ekrem. $3 3351504
245 1 0 $a Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 241 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Nelson Maldonado-Torres.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2017.
520 $a This dissertation examines nationalism, secularism, and identity issues in the works of three controversial writers of the late 20th and early 21st centuries: Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk. Through a comparative analysis of the theory and literature on national, religious and secular belonging, this study aims to clarify the function of metafiction as a literary technique, the novel as a genre, literature as a medium that questions, shapes or endorses identities, and Comparative Literature as a discipline that creates a link between theory and literary works. This study challenges one-sided and uncritical accounts of nationalism, secularism, and identity. I argue that, in direct or indirect dialogue with theory, the novels of Roth, Rushdie, and Pamuk all question forms of exclusivism in national, religious, and secular forms of belonging. This is shown through their use of metafiction and other literary devices that serve to engage in self-reflexivity. The examination of this literary production leads me to make explicit ways in which the forms of the novel and literature not only help to question forms of exclusion, but also are instrumental in calling for new, alternative, and non-exclusivist forms, definitions and possibilities of co-existence.
590 $a School code: 0190.
650 4 $a Comparative literature. $3 570001
650 4 $a Middle Eastern literature. $3 3175907
650 4 $a Modern literature. $3 2122750
650 4 $a Asian literature. $3 2122707
650 4 $a American literature. $3 523234
690 $a 0295
690 $a 0315
690 $a 0298
690 $a 0305
690 $a 0591
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick. $b Graduate School - New Brunswick. $3 1019196
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-08A(E).
790 $a 0190
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10584712