東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Friedrichs v. California Teachers As...

Muehlmann, Elizabeth.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, Union Security, Campaign Finance, and the First Amendment.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, Union Security, Campaign Finance, and the First Amendment./
作者:	Muehlmann, Elizabeth.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	112 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-05(E).
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10284577
ISBN:	9780355163919

Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, Union Security, Campaign Finance, and the First Amendment.
Muehlmann, Elizabeth.

Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, Union Security, Campaign Finance, and the First Amendment. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 112 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.

Thesis (M.A.)--California State University, Fullerton, 2017.

In 2016, the Supreme Court took the case Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association that would solidify its place in society not as an impartial referee, the last refuge in a politicized world, but as a political actor itself. The case presented the Court with an amalgamation of every attack levied at agency shops in the last 40 years. Petitioners relied on the Court's approach to campaign finance jurisprudence which had declared that money is speech and invoked the muddled areas of compelled speech and the compelled subsidization of speech. After evaluating the Court's approach to union security and campaign finance it is clear the Court has used the First Amendment to elevate corporate speech while also using it in labor management to undermine the union.

ISBN: 9780355163919Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, Union Security, Campaign Finance, and the First Amendment.
LDR:01757nmm a2200313 4500 001 2163475
005 20181022132813.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355163919
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10284577
035 $a (MiAaPQ)fullerton:10340
035 $a AAI10284577
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Muehlmann, Elizabeth. $3 3351495
245 1 0 $a Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, Union Security, Campaign Finance, and the First Amendment.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 112 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.
500 $a Adviser: Emily Erickson.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--California State University, Fullerton, 2017.
520 $a In 2016, the Supreme Court took the case Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association that would solidify its place in society not as an impartial referee, the last refuge in a politicized world, but as a political actor itself. The case presented the Court with an amalgamation of every attack levied at agency shops in the last 40 years. Petitioners relied on the Court's approach to campaign finance jurisprudence which had declared that money is speech and invoked the muddled areas of compelled speech and the compelled subsidization of speech. After evaluating the Court's approach to union security and campaign finance it is clear the Court has used the First Amendment to elevate corporate speech while also using it in labor management to undermine the union.
590 $a School code: 6060.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Labor relations. $3 3172144
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0629
710 2 $a California State University, Fullerton. $b Communications. $3 3351496
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-05(E).
790 $a 6060
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10284577