東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effective Planning in Real-Time Spea...

Lee, Shinhye.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effective Planning in Real-Time Speaking Test Tasks.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effective Planning in Real-Time Speaking Test Tasks./
作者:	Lee, Shinhye.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	245 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:	Language. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10810649
ISBN:	9780355883497

Effective Planning in Real-Time Speaking Test Tasks.
Lee, Shinhye.

Effective Planning in Real-Time Speaking Test Tasks. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 245 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2018.

In this dissertation, I documented the effectiveness of a particular test-taking condition in the current task-based performance testing (e.g., TOEFL iBT, IELTS, OPI); namely, planning time (the time given for test takers to plan their responses before actually performing). In assessment contexts, the construct of planning addresses both language and test-related theories; in terms of the latter, it is associated with components constituting test qualities (test validity, authenticity, and fairness; Wigglesworth & Elder, 2010). This is because planning time is already a critical test accommodation, or a task implementation condition, as termed from the task-based research paradigm. Indeed, researchers and test developers suggest planning time as a major component in determining task difficulty in that the varying planning conditions are appropriate to represent the items' different cognitive-demand levels (Norris, 2009; Robinson, 2001). Therefore, I explored whether test takers' efficient use of varying planning times is contingent upon test-task characteristics in the context of the TOEFL iBT Speaking test, in which which varying degrees of task conditions such as planning, and test-task types co-exist.

ISBN: 9780355883497Subjects--Topical Terms:

643551
Language.

Effective Planning in Real-Time Speaking Test Tasks.
LDR:04449nmm a2200337 4500 001 2162026
005 20181002081328.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355883497
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10810649
035 $a (MiAaPQ)grad.msu:15989
035 $a AAI10810649
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lee, Shinhye. $3 3349999
245 1 0 $a Effective Planning in Real-Time Speaking Test Tasks.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 245 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Paula M. Winke.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2018.
520 $a In this dissertation, I documented the effectiveness of a particular test-taking condition in the current task-based performance testing (e.g., TOEFL iBT, IELTS, OPI); namely, planning time (the time given for test takers to plan their responses before actually performing). In assessment contexts, the construct of planning addresses both language and test-related theories; in terms of the latter, it is associated with components constituting test qualities (test validity, authenticity, and fairness; Wigglesworth & Elder, 2010). This is because planning time is already a critical test accommodation, or a task implementation condition, as termed from the task-based research paradigm. Indeed, researchers and test developers suggest planning time as a major component in determining task difficulty in that the varying planning conditions are appropriate to represent the items' different cognitive-demand levels (Norris, 2009; Robinson, 2001). Therefore, I explored whether test takers' efficient use of varying planning times is contingent upon test-task characteristics in the context of the TOEFL iBT Speaking test, in which which varying degrees of task conditions such as planning, and test-task types co-exist.
520 $a Ninety-nine Korean university students took three speaking tests, which each consisted of one independent task (impromptu task) and two integrated tasks (reading-listening and listening-only tasks). As in operational testing, independent tasks were given 15 seconds to plan while the two integrated tasks were given 30 and 20 seconds, respectively. For each test set, participants performed under a specific planning condition: namely, Unguided planning (planning without specific instructions), Guided planning with Writing (planning with instructions given as to write to plan), and Guided planning with silently thinking (planning with instructions given as to think or outline silently to plan). After each test, test takers partook in a series of surveys and interviews to reflect on the appropriateness of each task's planning times. Subsequently, I undertook multiple methods (quantitative and qualitative) on the collected data points. Three independent raters scored a total of 891 speech samples according to the TOEFL iBT speaking rubric. Two trained coders coded the speech samples for the three discourse quality measures pertaining to complexity, accuracy, and fluency. I thematically analyzed survey and interview responses through NVivo.
520 $a Findings indicated that participants' performance and perceptions were directed by the influence of test-task characteristics regardless of the planning activities they made use of. Their test performance and speech quality varied from independent tasks to integrated tasks; they generally scored lower, and demonstrated slower speech rate, increased lexical errors, and simplified language in independent tasks. In addition, test takers believed that extended planning time was unnecessary for integrated tasks, for the reading and listening sources were readily applicable to actual responses; yet 15 seconds did not suffice for them for the independent tasks to familiarize themselves with the given prompt.
520 $a I discuss study results and conclude the dissertation by making connections between speech-production planning theories in task-based research (Robinson, 2001; Skehan, 1998) and planning time practices in second language assessment (Elder & Iwashita, 2005; Wigglesworth & Elder, 2010).
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Second Language Studies - Doctor of Philosophy. $3 3171490
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10810649