東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Writing to Learn in a Mutt Course: H...

Reid, Jennifer K.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Writing to Learn in a Mutt Course: How Writing Functions in a Social Justice Living Learning Program Seminar.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Writing to Learn in a Mutt Course: How Writing Functions in a Social Justice Living Learning Program Seminar./
作者:	Reid, Jennifer K.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	412 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10787731
ISBN:	9780355875928

Writing to Learn in a Mutt Course: How Writing Functions in a Social Justice Living Learning Program Seminar.
Reid, Jennifer K.

Writing to Learn in a Mutt Course: How Writing Functions in a Social Justice Living Learning Program Seminar. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 412 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Marquette University, 2018.

Learning communities, first-year seminars/experiences, writing intensive courses, and diversity/global learning programs are among the high-impact practices (HIP) shown to influence college student learning, retention, and overall experience (Kuh, 2008). Colleges and universities are creating programs and courses that incorporate these and other HIPs. Some of these courses do not fit neatly into particular disciplinary or interdisciplinary categories. The current research refers to such contexts as "mutt courses."

ISBN: 9780355875928Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.

Writing to Learn in a Mutt Course: How Writing Functions in a Social Justice Living Learning Program Seminar.
LDR:03457nmm a2200349 4500 001 2161960
005 20181002081327.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355875928
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10787731
035 $a (MiAaPQ)marquette:11308
035 $a AAI10787731
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Reid, Jennifer K. $3 3349930
245 1 0 $a Writing to Learn in a Mutt Course: How Writing Functions in a Social Justice Living Learning Program Seminar.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 412 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jody Jessup-Anger.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Marquette University, 2018.
520 $a Learning communities, first-year seminars/experiences, writing intensive courses, and diversity/global learning programs are among the high-impact practices (HIP) shown to influence college student learning, retention, and overall experience (Kuh, 2008). Colleges and universities are creating programs and courses that incorporate these and other HIPs. Some of these courses do not fit neatly into particular disciplinary or interdisciplinary categories. The current research refers to such contexts as "mutt courses."
520 $a Writing is often used to facilitate learning in mutt courses, yet virtually everything that is known about how writing promotes learning comes from research on writing in traditional disciplinary settings (e.g. history, engineering, psychology, etc.). The current research sought to understand if writing in a mutt course facilitated learning in similar ways as writing in other disciplinary courses.
520 $a The context was a credit bearing seminar part of a first-year residential living learning community focused on privilege and oppression. This seminar was not housed in any of the academic colleges at the university at which the research took place, but students received academic credit for the course, and it satisfied the university's core curriculum diversity requirement. The seminar was taught by instructors in student affairs and non-teaching academic divisions of the university. Students engaged in great deal of writing in this seminar (12 weekly response papers, an identity reflection, and an analysis paper).
520 $a Through an ethnographic study writing in this context, the current research sought to understand how writing facilitated achievement of course goals. Activity Theory (Engestrom, 2015) and the revised Bloom's Taxonomy (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001) were used as theoretical frameworks to understand what learning occurred and how.
520 $a The research found three functions of writing similar to those in traditional disciplinary settings (a demonstrative, learning, and discursive function). The discursive function was nuanced in that students conceptualized writing as a sort of conversation with peers. Additionally, instructors used writing to inform their practice. Furthermore, writing was found to influence students' desire to work toward inclusion. Implications for using writing in similar contexts is discussed as well as implications for theory and future research.
590 $a School code: 0116.
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a Marquette University. $b Educational Policy and Leadership. $3 3349931
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
790 $a 0116
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10787731