語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
PhD Students: Persistence or Peril?
~
Bach, Sarah Christine.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
PhD Students: Persistence or Peril?
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
PhD Students: Persistence or Peril?/
作者:
Bach, Sarah Christine.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:
245 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International79-08B(E).
標題:
Psychology. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10684792
ISBN:
9780355834093
PhD Students: Persistence or Peril?
Bach, Sarah Christine.
PhD Students: Persistence or Peril?
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 245 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2017.
This project sought to understand how psychological hardiness is related to graduate students' ability to perform, with a focus on group differences. The sample participants for this project were PhD students at UCI solicited through electronic communication by the Graduate Student division to participate in an online survey as well as an interview. The survey data collected consisted of questions that captured stress and strain levels, demographic variables such as age, first generation college student status, and race/ethnicity, as well as questions regarding social support, coping mechanisms, well-being, advisor and department support as well as future funding-anxiety. The model was then tested to conclude if 1. Hardiness moderates the strain derived from stress that affects performance outcomes for students. The findings for the full model tested supported the overall measures for a strong hardiness framework, such that social supports, engaged and distracted coping mechanisms, and well-being are all highly statistically related to hardiness. Furthermore, as theorized, stress is highly predictive of strain. However, the hypothesis that hardiness serves as a buffer of strain on performance for PhD students, was not supported. Rather, grittiness was found to positively predict performance for students in the later stages of their academic career. Parent educational attainment also positively predicted performance for this group of students. In interviews, student mothers used identifiable language to illuminate how the three C's of hardiness are incorporated into their daily lives. Also, age had a non-linear effect on performance for students such that the predicted age at which students peak in their performance level is 33, and tend to decrease in their performance every year thereafter. Results also indicated that there is an interaction effect for men with children as they get older such that while younger men with children appear to have higher levels of performance, it drops over time, and conversely, younger men without children, while starting at a lower level, steadily increase their level of performance through adulthood, and eventually surpass their counterparts at around age 37. Further work to parse out differences among subgroups of PhD students to determine appropriate supports is recommended.
ISBN: 9780355834093Subjects--Topical Terms:
519075
Psychology.
PhD Students: Persistence or Peril?
LDR
:03345nmm a2200349 4500
001
2161867
005
20181002081325.5
008
190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9780355834093
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10684792
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)uci:14881
035
$a
AAI10684792
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Bach, Sarah Christine.
$3
3349834
245
1 0
$a
PhD Students: Persistence or Peril?
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2017
300
$a
245 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: B.
500
$a
Adviser: John R. Hipp.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2017.
520
$a
This project sought to understand how psychological hardiness is related to graduate students' ability to perform, with a focus on group differences. The sample participants for this project were PhD students at UCI solicited through electronic communication by the Graduate Student division to participate in an online survey as well as an interview. The survey data collected consisted of questions that captured stress and strain levels, demographic variables such as age, first generation college student status, and race/ethnicity, as well as questions regarding social support, coping mechanisms, well-being, advisor and department support as well as future funding-anxiety. The model was then tested to conclude if 1. Hardiness moderates the strain derived from stress that affects performance outcomes for students. The findings for the full model tested supported the overall measures for a strong hardiness framework, such that social supports, engaged and distracted coping mechanisms, and well-being are all highly statistically related to hardiness. Furthermore, as theorized, stress is highly predictive of strain. However, the hypothesis that hardiness serves as a buffer of strain on performance for PhD students, was not supported. Rather, grittiness was found to positively predict performance for students in the later stages of their academic career. Parent educational attainment also positively predicted performance for this group of students. In interviews, student mothers used identifiable language to illuminate how the three C's of hardiness are incorporated into their daily lives. Also, age had a non-linear effect on performance for students such that the predicted age at which students peak in their performance level is 33, and tend to decrease in their performance every year thereafter. Results also indicated that there is an interaction effect for men with children as they get older such that while younger men with children appear to have higher levels of performance, it drops over time, and conversely, younger men without children, while starting at a lower level, steadily increase their level of performance through adulthood, and eventually surpass their counterparts at around age 37. Further work to parse out differences among subgroups of PhD students to determine appropriate supports is recommended.
590
$a
School code: 0030.
650
4
$a
Psychology.
$3
519075
650
4
$a
Sociology.
$3
516174
650
4
$a
Education.
$3
516579
650
4
$a
Higher education.
$3
641065
650
4
$a
Educational psychology.
$3
517650
650
4
$a
Personality psychology.
$3
2144789
690
$a
0621
690
$a
0626
690
$a
0515
690
$a
0745
690
$a
0525
690
$a
0625
710
2
$a
University of California, Irvine.
$b
Social Ecology.
$3
3276605
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
79-08B(E).
790
$a
0030
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2017
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10684792
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9361414
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入