東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Clinical Assessment of Pragmatics (C...

Lavi, Adriana.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Clinical Assessment of Pragmatics (CAPs): A Validation Study.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Clinical Assessment of Pragmatics (CAPs): A Validation Study./
作者:	Lavi, Adriana.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	106 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-05B(E).
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10169990
ISBN:	9781369241259

Clinical Assessment of Pragmatics (CAPs): A Validation Study.
Lavi, Adriana.

Clinical Assessment of Pragmatics (CAPs): A Validation Study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 106 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Loma Linda University, 2016.

The purpose of this study was bi-fold: to develop and analyze the validity and reliability of a comprehensive pragmatic language diagnostic tool, the Clinical Assessment of Pragmatics as well as comparatively examine and analyze pragmatic language profiles of three groups of adolescents. These included students with Language Impairment (LI), High-Functioning Autism (HFA) and typically developing students. During the validation phase of the study, thirty participants, ages 14 to 16 years old, were administered 3 pragmatic judgment and 3 pragmatic performance subtests comprised of 10 items each for a total of 60 test items. A series of validity and reliability measures were employed for the purpose of validating target diagnostic tool. During the second part of this study, one hundred and twenty participants, ages 14 to 16 years old, were administered the CAPs to comparatively analyze their receptive and expressive pragmatic language performance.

ISBN: 9781369241259Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.

Clinical Assessment of Pragmatics (CAPs): A Validation Study.
LDR:03234nmm a2200313 4500 001 2161711
005 20181002081319.5
008 190424s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369241259
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10169990
035 $a (MiAaPQ)llu:10378
035 $a AAI10169990
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lavi, Adriana. $3 3349667
245 1 0 $a Clinical Assessment of Pragmatics (CAPs): A Validation Study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 106 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Karen J. Mainess.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Loma Linda University, 2016.
520 $a The purpose of this study was bi-fold: to develop and analyze the validity and reliability of a comprehensive pragmatic language diagnostic tool, the Clinical Assessment of Pragmatics as well as comparatively examine and analyze pragmatic language profiles of three groups of adolescents. These included students with Language Impairment (LI), High-Functioning Autism (HFA) and typically developing students. During the validation phase of the study, thirty participants, ages 14 to 16 years old, were administered 3 pragmatic judgment and 3 pragmatic performance subtests comprised of 10 items each for a total of 60 test items. A series of validity and reliability measures were employed for the purpose of validating target diagnostic tool. During the second part of this study, one hundred and twenty participants, ages 14 to 16 years old, were administered the CAPs to comparatively analyze their receptive and expressive pragmatic language performance.
520 $a Study results revealed that this instrument provides a valid and reliable comprehensive measure of pragmatic language skills. Both test-retest and interrater reliability were found to be strong. Experts rated the CAPs highly for both content and clarity. Concurrent validity was obtained on three of the CAPs subtests and was found to correlate to three existing pragmatic language instruments and measures (the Clinical Assessment of Spoken Language - Pragmatic Judgement subtest, the Test of Pragmatic Language and the Social Language Development Test, adolescent). Further, the results revealed significant differences among all groups of students on expressive and receptive pragmatic language tasks. Students with HFA and SLI demonstrated adequate performances on instrumental pragmatic language tasks. However, they had significant difficulties on higher order pragmatics such as perceiving irony, sarcasm, and expressing sorrow or support. Furthermore, the HFA group was distinguished by profound deficits in students' ability to recognize and appropriately use facial expressions. CAPs is a tool which is both valid and reliable and can be used as a means of determining whether school-aged students present with deficits in pragmatic language skills, specifically, high-functioning autism or specific language impairment.
590 $a School code: 0106.
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0460
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a Loma Linda University. $b Rehabilitation Science. $3 3344331
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-05B(E).
790 $a 0106
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10169990