東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparison of Campsite Impact Monito...

Jackson, Brendan.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies./
Author:	Jackson, Brendan.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	59 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-03(E).
Subject:	Recreation. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10252961
ISBN:	9781369504514

Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies.
Jackson, Brendan.

Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 59 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 2016.

Ranking methodologies for estimating campsite impacts have traditionally been used in addition to (and sometimes in place of) actual measures of impacts. Ranking systems are seen as easier to implement; however, there is concern that these methods may not accurately predict actual measures of impact. Multiple methods of campsite impact monitoring (including both ranking and actual measures) were applied within the Pharaoh Lake Wilderness Area in upstate New York to evaluate how well ranking methodologies compare to each other as well as correlate with quantitative measures. Ranking methodologies were found to produce generally similar results, and the ranking methodologies also significantly correlated with some but not all of the actual measures. Ranking methods can be useful and efficient predictors for some types of impact, but should be used carefully for this purpose. More research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of some monitoring methodologies.

ISBN: 9781369504514Subjects--Topical Terms:

535376
Recreation.

Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies.
LDR:01948nmm a2200313 4500 001 2160929
005 20180803131930.5
008 190424s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369504514
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10252961
035 $a (MiAaPQ)esf:10669
035 $a AAI10252961
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jackson, Brendan. $3 3348860
245 1 0 $a Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 59 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.
500 $a Adviser: Diane M. Kuehn.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 2016.
520 $a Ranking methodologies for estimating campsite impacts have traditionally been used in addition to (and sometimes in place of) actual measures of impacts. Ranking systems are seen as easier to implement; however, there is concern that these methods may not accurately predict actual measures of impact. Multiple methods of campsite impact monitoring (including both ranking and actual measures) were applied within the Pharaoh Lake Wilderness Area in upstate New York to evaluate how well ranking methodologies compare to each other as well as correlate with quantitative measures. Ranking methodologies were found to produce generally similar results, and the ranking methodologies also significantly correlated with some but not all of the actual measures. Ranking methods can be useful and efficient predictors for some types of impact, but should be used carefully for this purpose. More research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of some monitoring methodologies.
590 $a School code: 0213.
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
650 4 $a Forestry. $3 895157
650 4 $a Environmental science. $3 677245
690 $a 0814
690 $a 0478
690 $a 0768
710 2 $a State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. $b Forest Resources Management. $3 1057436
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-03(E).
790 $a 0213
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10252961