東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Emergent arguments: Digital media an...

Kelly, Kristy L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Emergent arguments: Digital media and social argumentation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Emergent arguments: Digital media and social argumentation./
作者:	Kelly, Kristy L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	204 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-07A(E).
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10246092
ISBN:	9781369610413

Emergent arguments: Digital media and social argumentation.
Kelly, Kristy L.

Emergent arguments: Digital media and social argumentation. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 204 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2016.

This dissertation proposes a new framework for understanding how argumentation and rhetorical action unfold in digital space. While studies in the field of rhetorical theory often address new discursive practices in spaces like Twitter and Facebook, they do not always assess the ways that the platforms themselves can influence the forms and conventions of argumentation. Similarly, the field of new media studies has attended to the structural and technical components of digital platforms, but rarely views these details through a rhetorical lens. Thus, this dissertation combines the two disciplines by approaching its thesis from two angles. First, it employs major scholarly and theoretical work from the field of rhetorical studies to determine the ways in which digital rhetorical practices align with or differ from previous ones. Second, it combines new media scholarship with close readings of digital texts, in order to examine how argumentation functions across different media platforms. This interdisciplinary approach provides unique insight into the ways that media platforms and rhetorical practices coevolve.

ISBN: 9781369610413Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.

Emergent arguments: Digital media and social argumentation.
LDR:03009nmm a2200313 4500 001 2160591
005 20180727091509.5
008 190424s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369610413
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10246092
035 $a (MiAaPQ)oregon:11752
035 $a AAI10246092
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kelly, Kristy L. $3 3348518
245 1 0 $a Emergent arguments: Digital media and social argumentation.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 204 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: John Gage.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2016.
520 $a This dissertation proposes a new framework for understanding how argumentation and rhetorical action unfold in digital space. While studies in the field of rhetorical theory often address new discursive practices in spaces like Twitter and Facebook, they do not always assess the ways that the platforms themselves can influence the forms and conventions of argumentation. Similarly, the field of new media studies has attended to the structural and technical components of digital platforms, but rarely views these details through a rhetorical lens. Thus, this dissertation combines the two disciplines by approaching its thesis from two angles. First, it employs major scholarly and theoretical work from the field of rhetorical studies to determine the ways in which digital rhetorical practices align with or differ from previous ones. Second, it combines new media scholarship with close readings of digital texts, in order to examine how argumentation functions across different media platforms. This interdisciplinary approach provides unique insight into the ways that media platforms and rhetorical practices coevolve.
520 $a The dissertation's central term, "emergent arguments," marks an epistemological shift away from the idea that an argument resides within a single text or narrative. Instead, arguments emerge from sustained and engaged interactions with digital communities, from explorations of hyperlinked trails of information, from patterns of images, words, and datasets. In digital space, knowledge is constructed communally, meaning that argumentation takes place in collaboration with a community. The project follows closely with the work of Aristotle and Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca, where argumentation is an inherently social act driven by cultural context and shared knowledge. The dissertation builds upon this premise by claiming that digital media make this sociality visible, traceable, and more dynamic than previous communicative platforms. It ultimately argues that in digital space, meaning itself is social, intertextual, and multimodal.
590 $a School code: 0171.
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a University of Oregon. $b Department of English. $3 1677550
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-07A(E).
790 $a 0171
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10246092