東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Fighting Green: How Congress and the...

Blakeley, Katherine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Fighting Green: How Congress and the Pentagon Make Defense Policy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Fighting Green: How Congress and the Pentagon Make Defense Policy./
作者:	Blakeley, Katherine.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	482 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-07A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10687702
ISBN:	9780355671674

Fighting Green: How Congress and the Pentagon Make Defense Policy.
Blakeley, Katherine.

Fighting Green: How Congress and the Pentagon Make Defense Policy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 482 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Cruz, 2017.

Fighting Green examines how Congress and the Pentagon make defense policy, using Congressional attempts to influence the Pentagon's use of energy between FY 2004--FY 2013 as a lens. Congress' role in shaping military and defense policy falls into a lacuna between international relations and Americanists' studies of domestic policy. Far from abdicating its power and prerogatives, Congress in fact exerts substantial influence on defense policy through the annual defense policy bill, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The assured and routinized annual passage of the NDAA make it a vehicle for substantive oversight and policymaking by the Congressional defense committees and policy entrepreneurs, but this legislative action and oversight remains sub rosa, rather than triggering broader public debates of the problems and potential solutions.

ISBN: 9780355671674Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

Fighting Green: How Congress and the Pentagon Make Defense Policy.
LDR:03285nmm a2200337 4500 001 2157255
005 20180531091029.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355671674
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10687702
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucsc:11438
035 $a AAI10687702
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Blakeley, Katherine. $3 3345058
245 1 0 $a Fighting Green: How Congress and the Pentagon Make Defense Policy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 482 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Daniel Wirls.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Cruz, 2017.
520 $a Fighting Green examines how Congress and the Pentagon make defense policy, using Congressional attempts to influence the Pentagon's use of energy between FY 2004--FY 2013 as a lens. Congress' role in shaping military and defense policy falls into a lacuna between international relations and Americanists' studies of domestic policy. Far from abdicating its power and prerogatives, Congress in fact exerts substantial influence on defense policy through the annual defense policy bill, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The assured and routinized annual passage of the NDAA make it a vehicle for substantive oversight and policymaking by the Congressional defense committees and policy entrepreneurs, but this legislative action and oversight remains sub rosa, rather than triggering broader public debates of the problems and potential solutions.
520 $a The first half of this dissertation focuses on Congress and the unique legislative vehicle of the NDAA. Narrative case studies of the legislative history of selected provisions illustrate how defense policymaking functions in practice. Quantitative analysis of the origination, content, and success or failure of legislative provisions related to DOD's energy use provides a fuller analysis of how defense policymaking works, its characteristics, and its limitations. Successful defense policymaking tends to be incremental, uncontroversial, advance a clear defense policy or national security interest, and not require appropriated funds, suggesting that what I term "small-bore defense policymaking" as a successful avenue for defense policymaking. The balance of power lies with the House and Senate Armed Services Committees members and their staffs, but the unique role of the NDAA as a will-pass bill increases the incentive for party leaders to add non-germane policy riders, in a modified inside-leadership game.
520 $a The second half of this dissertation follows the defense energy provisions from the prior chapters into the Pentagon, evaluating their implementation and ultimate impact, with implications for Congressional policymaking, the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch, the role of partisanship, and the scope of the defense bureaucracy to shape and attenuate Congressional policy actions.
590 $a School code: 0036.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 2122803
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a University of California, Santa Cruz. $b Politics (Environmental Studies). $3 3345059
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-07A(E).
790 $a 0036
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10687702