語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality'...
~
Fugo, Justin I.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality': Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality': Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference./
作者:
Fugo, Justin I.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:
249 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International79-05A(E).
標題:
Philosophy. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10635997
ISBN:
9780355588392
Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality': Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference.
Fugo, Justin I.
Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality': Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 249 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Temple University, 2017.
This dissertation adopts a 'social criticism' model in order to analyze racism in our contemporary world---particularly the United States. This analysis offers a detailed account of racism as rooted in social structural processes, and prioritizes oppression and domination as the chief wrongs resulting from racism. To do so, said analysis highlights norms, ideals, policies, and actions, that are often assumed to be 'race neutral' (e.g., impartiality, merit, 'natural rights', and autonomy), and the role they play in the production of racial injustice. More specifically, it exposes how these norms function to undermine human agency by restricting means for self-development and self-determination. As such, the role that inclusive and democratic deliberation can play in combatting racial oppression and domination is developed.
ISBN: 9780355588392Subjects--Topical Terms:
516511
Philosophy.
Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality': Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference.
LDR
:02714nmm a2200325 4500
001
2157097
005
20180529084352.5
008
190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9780355588392
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10635997
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)temple:13108
035
$a
AAI10635997
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Fugo, Justin I.
$0
(orcid)0000-0002-6062-3408
$3
3344880
245
1 0
$a
Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality': Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2017
300
$a
249 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Espen Hammer.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Temple University, 2017.
520
$a
This dissertation adopts a 'social criticism' model in order to analyze racism in our contemporary world---particularly the United States. This analysis offers a detailed account of racism as rooted in social structural processes, and prioritizes oppression and domination as the chief wrongs resulting from racism. To do so, said analysis highlights norms, ideals, policies, and actions, that are often assumed to be 'race neutral' (e.g., impartiality, merit, 'natural rights', and autonomy), and the role they play in the production of racial injustice. More specifically, it exposes how these norms function to undermine human agency by restricting means for self-development and self-determination. As such, the role that inclusive and democratic deliberation can play in combatting racial oppression and domination is developed.
520
$a
In light of this analysis, a defense of a 'concrete morality' which prioritizes the fight against oppression and domination, is made against an 'abstract morality' that adheres to 'ideally just' principles regardless of the injustice that results from doing so. Moreover, this project develops a 'shared responsibility model' for racial injustice, articulating varying degrees and kinds of responsibility we have for correcting it. It concludes by offering 'democratic equality of difference' as a normative ideal for cultivating racial justice. Generally, said ideal aims to: create basic conditions for the self-development and collective self-determination of all; cultivate a universally inclusive and ongoing process of democratic deliberation for solving collective problems; and attend to difference when deliberating about matters of justice.
590
$a
School code: 0225.
650
4
$a
Philosophy.
$3
516511
650
4
$a
Ethnic studies.
$2
bicssc
$3
1556779
650
4
$a
Sociology.
$3
516174
690
$a
0422
690
$a
0631
690
$a
0626
710
2
$a
Temple University.
$b
Philosophy.
$3
1677565
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
79-05A(E).
790
$a
0225
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2017
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10635997
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9356644
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入