東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Essays on Corporate Investment Dynamics.

Peters, Ryan Peters.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Essays on Corporate Investment Dynamics.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays on Corporate Investment Dynamics./
作者:	Peters, Ryan Peters.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	123 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-12A(E).
標題:	Finance. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10270941
ISBN:	9780355110111

Essays on Corporate Investment Dynamics.
Peters, Ryan Peters.

Essays on Corporate Investment Dynamics. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 123 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2017.

This dissertation contains two paper. The first, "Volatility and Venture Capital," demonstrates that the performance of venture capital (VC) investments load positively on shocks to aggregate return volatility. I document this novel source of risk at the asset-class, fund, and portfolio-company levels. The positive relation between VC performance and volatility is driven by the option-like structure of VC investments, especially by VCs' contractual option to reinvest. At the asset-class level, shocks to aggregate volatility explain a substantial fraction of VC returns. At the fund level, consistent with the reinvestment channel, this exposure is concentrated in years two through four of fund life and in early-stage VC funds, which have more embedded reinvestment options. For VC-backed portfolio companies, volatility shocks correlate with faster and more frequent reinvestment. The level of volatility at the time of investment has no relation with future performance, consistent with competitive markets. Overall, my results imply that the option-like features of VC investments are first-order determinants of risk in VC.

ISBN: 9780355110111Subjects--Topical Terms:

542899
Finance.

Essays on Corporate Investment Dynamics.
LDR:03013nmm a2200313 4500 001 2156846
005 20180529081859.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355110111
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10270941
035 $a (MiAaPQ)upenngdas:12710
035 $a AAI10270941
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Peters, Ryan Peters. $3 3344622
245 1 0 $a Essays on Corporate Investment Dynamics.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 123 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Lucian A. Taylor.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2017.
520 $a This dissertation contains two paper. The first, "Volatility and Venture Capital," demonstrates that the performance of venture capital (VC) investments load positively on shocks to aggregate return volatility. I document this novel source of risk at the asset-class, fund, and portfolio-company levels. The positive relation between VC performance and volatility is driven by the option-like structure of VC investments, especially by VCs' contractual option to reinvest. At the asset-class level, shocks to aggregate volatility explain a substantial fraction of VC returns. At the fund level, consistent with the reinvestment channel, this exposure is concentrated in years two through four of fund life and in early-stage VC funds, which have more embedded reinvestment options. For VC-backed portfolio companies, volatility shocks correlate with faster and more frequent reinvestment. The level of volatility at the time of investment has no relation with future performance, consistent with competitive markets. Overall, my results imply that the option-like features of VC investments are first-order determinants of risk in VC.
520 $a The second paper, "Intangible Capital and the Investment-q Relation," shows that the neoclassical theory of investment, which has mainly been tested with physical investment, also helps explain intangible investment. At the firm level, Tobin's q explains physical and intangible investment roughly equally well, and it explains total investment even better. Compared with physical capital, intangible capital adjusts more slowly to changes in investment opportunities. The classic q theory performs better in firms and years with more intangible capital: Total and even physical investment are better explained by Tobin's q and are less sensitive to cash flow. At the macro level, Tobin's q explains intangible investment many times better than physical investment. We propose a simple, new Tobin's q proxy that accounts for intangible capital, and we show that it is a superior proxy for both physical and intangible investment opportunities.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
650 4 $a Economic theory. $3 1556984
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0511
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $b Finance. $3 2095393
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-12A(E).
790 $a 0175
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10270941