東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

CEO Leadership Styles, Labor Product...

Contacos-Sawyer, Jonna.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

CEO Leadership Styles, Labor Productivity, and the Moderating Effect of Performance Management Systems: A Correlation Study in Pennsylvania's Small Manufacturing Sector.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	CEO Leadership Styles, Labor Productivity, and the Moderating Effect of Performance Management Systems: A Correlation Study in Pennsylvania's Small Manufacturing Sector./
作者:	Contacos-Sawyer, Jonna.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	163 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-02A(E).
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10637170
ISBN:	9780355408034

CEO Leadership Styles, Labor Productivity, and the Moderating Effect of Performance Management Systems: A Correlation Study in Pennsylvania's Small Manufacturing Sector.
Contacos-Sawyer, Jonna.

CEO Leadership Styles, Labor Productivity, and the Moderating Effect of Performance Management Systems: A Correlation Study in Pennsylvania's Small Manufacturing Sector. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 163 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--Northcentral University, 2017.

Effectively implemented performance management systems (PM systems) resulted in improved organizational performance. However, over the past 10 years, researchers concluded that PM system satisfaction and effectiveness continued to decline. Likewise, researchers were increasingly interested in the transformational leadership styles of chief executive officers (CEOs) and their effect on organizational performance. Researchers to date did not examine the relationship between leadership styles to a formal PM system framework. Thirty-five leaders completed a transformational leadership self-assessment and identified their companies' practices in comparison to a formal PM system. The purpose of this quantitative correlation study was to identify the leadership styles and behaviors of CEOs in Pennsylvania's (PA's) small manufacturing industry and to determine if a relationship existed between leadership styles, labor productivity, and the moderating effect of PM systems. Using correlation and linear regression for the seven measured aspects of leadership style, only Management by Exception Active (MBEA), a measure of transactional leadership style, was moderately significantly correlated with labor productivity, but the correlation was negative. To test for any possible effect of the presence of the study participants' PM system scores on the relationship between leadership style and labor productivity, multiple regression was used. Performance management system scores did not significantly moderate the relationship between leadership styles and labor productivity. Based on the findings of this study and consistent with previous researchers' findings, PM systems were not effective and CEOs did not have the required elements in place to realize the benefits of effective PM systems. Recommendations are for CEOs of small manufacturers to implement the elements of the formal PM system framework used in the study to potentially influence higher levels of labor productivity. In addition, the results of this study provide information for CEOs wanting to further develop their transformational and transactional leadership skills to potentially increase labor productivity. Future researchers interested in replicating or extending the findings of this study, should consider focusing on a single manufacturing industry classification to control for the wide variation in labor productivity revealed in this study and may improve the generalizability of the findings.

ISBN: 9780355408034Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

CEO Leadership Styles, Labor Productivity, and the Moderating Effect of Performance Management Systems: A Correlation Study in Pennsylvania's Small Manufacturing Sector.
LDR:03558nmm a2200313 4500 001 2156774
005 20180517121920.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355408034
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10637170
035 $a (MiAaPQ)northcentral:12408
035 $a AAI10637170
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Contacos-Sawyer, Jonna. $3 3344545
245 1 0 $a CEO Leadership Styles, Labor Productivity, and the Moderating Effect of Performance Management Systems: A Correlation Study in Pennsylvania's Small Manufacturing Sector.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 163 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Cynthia Loubier.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--Northcentral University, 2017.
520 $a Effectively implemented performance management systems (PM systems) resulted in improved organizational performance. However, over the past 10 years, researchers concluded that PM system satisfaction and effectiveness continued to decline. Likewise, researchers were increasingly interested in the transformational leadership styles of chief executive officers (CEOs) and their effect on organizational performance. Researchers to date did not examine the relationship between leadership styles to a formal PM system framework. Thirty-five leaders completed a transformational leadership self-assessment and identified their companies' practices in comparison to a formal PM system. The purpose of this quantitative correlation study was to identify the leadership styles and behaviors of CEOs in Pennsylvania's (PA's) small manufacturing industry and to determine if a relationship existed between leadership styles, labor productivity, and the moderating effect of PM systems. Using correlation and linear regression for the seven measured aspects of leadership style, only Management by Exception Active (MBEA), a measure of transactional leadership style, was moderately significantly correlated with labor productivity, but the correlation was negative. To test for any possible effect of the presence of the study participants' PM system scores on the relationship between leadership style and labor productivity, multiple regression was used. Performance management system scores did not significantly moderate the relationship between leadership styles and labor productivity. Based on the findings of this study and consistent with previous researchers' findings, PM systems were not effective and CEOs did not have the required elements in place to realize the benefits of effective PM systems. Recommendations are for CEOs of small manufacturers to implement the elements of the formal PM system framework used in the study to potentially influence higher levels of labor productivity. In addition, the results of this study provide information for CEOs wanting to further develop their transformational and transactional leadership skills to potentially increase labor productivity. Future researchers interested in replicating or extending the findings of this study, should consider focusing on a single manufacturing industry classification to control for the wide variation in labor productivity revealed in this study and may improve the generalizability of the findings.
590 $a School code: 1443.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Labor economics. $3 642730
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0510
690 $a 0602
710 2 $a Northcentral University. $b Business and Technology Management. $3 2100236
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-02A(E).
790 $a 1443
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10637170