東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Speaking American: Comparing Supreme...

Hawkins, Paul Henry.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Speaking American: Comparing Supreme Court and Hollywood racial interpretation in the early twenty -first century.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Speaking American: Comparing Supreme Court and Hollywood racial interpretation in the early twenty -first century./
作者:	Hawkins, Paul Henry.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2010,
面頁冊數:	160 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 3006.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-08A.
標題:	American history. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3470454
ISBN:	9781124123165

Speaking American: Comparing Supreme Court and Hollywood racial interpretation in the early twenty -first century.
Hawkins, Paul Henry.

Speaking American: Comparing Supreme Court and Hollywood racial interpretation in the early twenty -first century. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2010 - 160 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 3006.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Union Institute and University, 2010.

Apprehending that race is social, not biological, this study examines U.S. racial formation in the early twenty-first century. In particular, Hollywood and Supreme Court texts are analyzed as media for gathering, shaping and transmitting racial ideas. Representing Hollywood, the 2004 film Crash is analyzed. Representing the Supreme Court, the study examines Grutter v. Bollinger and Parents Involved v. Seattle Schools. To more fully describe how these texts reflect and then reenter a stream of social discourse, two theories are successively employed. First, Roland Barthes' theory of mythology is used to deconstruct layers of meaning in the texts. Second, Michel Foucault's theory of power is used to explain how the meaning in the text attempts to shape ideas about race in the post-civil rights era. The combination of these theories not only helps readers better understand how texts act as instruments of racial formation, it extends the field of semiological inquiry in which these theories were grounded. By applying Barthes and Foucault, this study demonstrates that both Hollywood and the Supreme Court, despite a veneer of twenty-first century racial progress, actually produce texts that seek to maintain centuries of disparate power between racial collectives.

ISBN: 9781124123165Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122692
American history.

Speaking American: Comparing Supreme Court and Hollywood racial interpretation in the early twenty -first century.
LDR:02315nmm a2200325 4500 001 2156300
005 20180517123959.5
008 190424s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124123165
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3470454
035 $a AAI3470454
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hawkins, Paul Henry. $3 3344069
245 1 0 $a Speaking American: Comparing Supreme Court and Hollywood racial interpretation in the early twenty -first century.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2010
300 $a 160 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 3006.
500 $a Adviser: Elizabeth A. Pastores-Palffy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Union Institute and University, 2010.
520 $a Apprehending that race is social, not biological, this study examines U.S. racial formation in the early twenty-first century. In particular, Hollywood and Supreme Court texts are analyzed as media for gathering, shaping and transmitting racial ideas. Representing Hollywood, the 2004 film Crash is analyzed. Representing the Supreme Court, the study examines Grutter v. Bollinger and Parents Involved v. Seattle Schools. To more fully describe how these texts reflect and then reenter a stream of social discourse, two theories are successively employed. First, Roland Barthes' theory of mythology is used to deconstruct layers of meaning in the texts. Second, Michel Foucault's theory of power is used to explain how the meaning in the text attempts to shape ideas about race in the post-civil rights era. The combination of these theories not only helps readers better understand how texts act as instruments of racial formation, it extends the field of semiological inquiry in which these theories were grounded. By applying Barthes and Foucault, this study demonstrates that both Hollywood and the Supreme Court, despite a veneer of twenty-first century racial progress, actually produce texts that seek to maintain centuries of disparate power between racial collectives.
590 $a School code: 1414.
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a Cultural anthropology. $3 2122764
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Film studies. $3 2122736
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0900
710 2 $a Union Institute and University. $3 1017694
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-08A.
790 $a 1414
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3470454