東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effects of Computer Assisted Learnin...

Bayley-Hamlet, Simone O.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of Computer Assisted Learning Instructions on Reading Achievement among Middle School English Language Learners.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effects of Computer Assisted Learning Instructions on Reading Achievement among Middle School English Language Learners./
作者:	Bayley-Hamlet, Simone O.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	154 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-01A(E).
標題:	English as a second language. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10600784
ISBN:	9780355160567

Effects of Computer Assisted Learning Instructions on Reading Achievement among Middle School English Language Learners.
Bayley-Hamlet, Simone O.

Effects of Computer Assisted Learning Instructions on Reading Achievement among Middle School English Language Learners. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 154 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (EDD/CI)--University of Phoenix, 2017.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of Imagine Learning, a computer assisted language learning (CALL) program, on addressing reading achievement for English language learners (ELLs). This is a measurement used in the Accessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State (ACCESS for ELLs or ACCESS) reading scale scores. Low reading scores among ELLs on state standardized tests suggested that schools were not meeting this subgroup's needs. This quantitative quasi-experimental study used a pre- and posttest two group design. In this design, there were two groups; one group used Imagine Learning. The control group did not use the Imagine Learning program over the same period. Gains on the ACCESS for ELLs and Georgia Milestones (GM) scaled scores were calculated using an Independent Sample t test and ANOVA tests. The findings indicated that there was a significant difference (p = .003) in the ACCESS for ELLs reading assessment scores of ELL students enrolled in Imagine Learning compared with students who did not use Imagine Learning. The null hypothesis was rejected for the ACCESS and accepted for the GMAS. The results suggested that students in eighth grade who use Imagine Learning showed no greater gains on the ACCESS for ELLs reading assessments than students who did not use Imagine Learning. With regard to GM, students' performance or gain scores were not significantly different.

ISBN: 9780355160567Subjects--Topical Terms:

516208
English as a second language.

Effects of Computer Assisted Learning Instructions on Reading Achievement among Middle School English Language Learners.
LDR:02465nmm a2200325 4500 001 2156134
005 20180517123956.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355160567
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10600784
035 $a (MiAaPQ)phoenix:10525
035 $a AAI10600784
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bayley-Hamlet, Simone O. $3 3343901
245 1 0 $a Effects of Computer Assisted Learning Instructions on Reading Achievement among Middle School English Language Learners.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 154 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Michelle Hill.
502 $a Thesis (EDD/CI)--University of Phoenix, 2017.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of Imagine Learning, a computer assisted language learning (CALL) program, on addressing reading achievement for English language learners (ELLs). This is a measurement used in the Accessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State (ACCESS for ELLs or ACCESS) reading scale scores. Low reading scores among ELLs on state standardized tests suggested that schools were not meeting this subgroup's needs. This quantitative quasi-experimental study used a pre- and posttest two group design. In this design, there were two groups; one group used Imagine Learning. The control group did not use the Imagine Learning program over the same period. Gains on the ACCESS for ELLs and Georgia Milestones (GM) scaled scores were calculated using an Independent Sample t test and ANOVA tests. The findings indicated that there was a significant difference (p = .003) in the ACCESS for ELLs reading assessment scores of ELL students enrolled in Imagine Learning compared with students who did not use Imagine Learning. The null hypothesis was rejected for the ACCESS and accepted for the GMAS. The results suggested that students in eighth grade who use Imagine Learning showed no greater gains on the ACCESS for ELLs reading assessments than students who did not use Imagine Learning. With regard to GM, students' performance or gain scores were not significantly different.
590 $a School code: 0850.
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Middle school education. $3 969762
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0450
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a University of Phoenix. $b Advanced Studies. $3 2095840
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-01A(E).
790 $a 0850
791 $a EDD/CI
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10600784