東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Multilingual Students' Perceptions o...

Vo, Hong Thi Tuyet.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Multilingual Students' Perceptions of and Experiences with Instructor Feedback Methods in a U.S. First-Year Composition Class.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Multilingual Students' Perceptions of and Experiences with Instructor Feedback Methods in a U.S. First-Year Composition Class./
作者:	Vo, Hong Thi Tuyet.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	126 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-04(E).
標題:	English as a second language. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10266706
ISBN:	9781369786507

Multilingual Students' Perceptions of and Experiences with Instructor Feedback Methods in a U.S. First-Year Composition Class.
Vo, Hong Thi Tuyet.

Multilingual Students' Perceptions of and Experiences with Instructor Feedback Methods in a U.S. First-Year Composition Class. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 126 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2017.

While instructor feedback has generally been recognized as an essential factor in enhancing writing proficiency for multilingual writers, little known research has focused on students' perceptions of and their experiences with different modes of instructor feedback. In addition, impacts of various feedback methods on students' writing have remained debatable. This case study seeks to gain an in-depth understanding of the meaning and significance of three instructor feedback methods, namely written, oral, and audio-visual feedback, from students' perspectives. Furthermore, it offers additional insights into the impacts of these three instructor feedback methods on students' writing. To be more precise, this study aims to answer two main research questions: (a) What are multilingual students' attitudes toward instructor feedback methods (i.e., written, oral, and audio-visual feedback)? and (b) How do these instructor feedback methods impact multilingual students' writing and their writing experiences? In order to answer these questions, qualitative data, including three open-ended questionnaires administered after each specific feedback method is employed, transcriptions of thirty-minute recorded interviews with individual students after the implementation of the three feedback methods, and students' written artifacts from their three ENG 101 essays, were collected from the two consenting students within one-semester of their first-year composition class at a Midwestern state university. Thematic content analysis of the questionnaire and interview data through the use of NVivo software program were organized into four critical areas: (1) Students' introduction of their experiences with feedback, (2) Students' various attitudes toward feedback, (3) Students' applications of feedback, and (4) Various impacts of feedback. Additionally, the qualitative analysis of students' written artifacts resulted in three emergent themes, including completely successful revision, considerably successful revision, and little successful revision. The findings show that although the two students perceived the three instructor feedback methods positively, there were not only variations in their perceptions of and experiences with each feedback format, but also different levels of success in their applications of each form of instructor feedback into their revisions. Based on these research results, possible implications are discussed for second language writing instruction and for further studies on the important topic of feedback in writing instruction.

ISBN: 9781369786507Subjects--Topical Terms:

516208
English as a second language.

Multilingual Students' Perceptions of and Experiences with Instructor Feedback Methods in a U.S. First-Year Composition Class.
LDR:03561nmm a2200301 4500 001 2156060
005 20180517123955.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369786507
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10266706
035 $a (MiAaPQ)mnsu:10672
035 $a AAI10266706
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Vo, Hong Thi Tuyet. $3 3343824
245 1 0 $a Multilingual Students' Perceptions of and Experiences with Instructor Feedback Methods in a U.S. First-Year Composition Class.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 126 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
500 $a Adviser: Sarah Henderson Lee.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2017.
520 $a While instructor feedback has generally been recognized as an essential factor in enhancing writing proficiency for multilingual writers, little known research has focused on students' perceptions of and their experiences with different modes of instructor feedback. In addition, impacts of various feedback methods on students' writing have remained debatable. This case study seeks to gain an in-depth understanding of the meaning and significance of three instructor feedback methods, namely written, oral, and audio-visual feedback, from students' perspectives. Furthermore, it offers additional insights into the impacts of these three instructor feedback methods on students' writing. To be more precise, this study aims to answer two main research questions: (a) What are multilingual students' attitudes toward instructor feedback methods (i.e., written, oral, and audio-visual feedback)? and (b) How do these instructor feedback methods impact multilingual students' writing and their writing experiences? In order to answer these questions, qualitative data, including three open-ended questionnaires administered after each specific feedback method is employed, transcriptions of thirty-minute recorded interviews with individual students after the implementation of the three feedback methods, and students' written artifacts from their three ENG 101 essays, were collected from the two consenting students within one-semester of their first-year composition class at a Midwestern state university. Thematic content analysis of the questionnaire and interview data through the use of NVivo software program were organized into four critical areas: (1) Students' introduction of their experiences with feedback, (2) Students' various attitudes toward feedback, (3) Students' applications of feedback, and (4) Various impacts of feedback. Additionally, the qualitative analysis of students' written artifacts resulted in three emergent themes, including completely successful revision, considerably successful revision, and little successful revision. The findings show that although the two students perceived the three instructor feedback methods positively, there were not only variations in their perceptions of and experiences with each feedback format, but also different levels of success in their applications of each form of instructor feedback into their revisions. Based on these research results, possible implications are discussed for second language writing instruction and for further studies on the important topic of feedback in writing instruction.
590 $a School code: 1510.
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Bilingual education. $3 2122778
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0282
710 2 $a Minnesota State University, Mankato. $b English: MA TESL. $3 1680008
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-04(E).
790 $a 1510
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10266706