東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Structural Validity and Reliability ...

Watley, Laura Erin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Structural Validity and Reliability of Two Observation Protocols in College Mathematics.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Structural Validity and Reliability of Two Observation Protocols in College Mathematics./
作者:	Watley, Laura Erin.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	117 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-11B(E).
標題:	Mathematics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10262898
ISBN:	9781369872361

Structural Validity and Reliability of Two Observation Protocols in College Mathematics.
Watley, Laura Erin.

Structural Validity and Reliability of Two Observation Protocols in College Mathematics. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 117 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Alabama, 2017.

Undergraduate mathematics education is being challenged to improve, with peer evaluation, student evaluations, and portfolio assessments as the primary methods of formative and summative assessment used by instructors. Observation protocols like the Mathematics Classroom Observation Protocol for Practices (MCOP2) and the abbreviated Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (aRTOP) are another alternative. However, before these observation protocols can be used in the classroom with confidence, a study needed to be conducted to examine both the aRTOP and the MCOP2. This study was conducted at three large doctorate-granting universities and eight masters and baccalaureate institutions. Both the aRTOP and the MCOP2 were evaluated in 110 classroom observations during the Spring 2016, Fall 2016, and Spring 2017 semesters. The data analysis allowed conclusions regarding the internal structure, internal reliability, and relationship between the constructs measured by both observation protocols.

ISBN: 9781369872361Subjects--Topical Terms:

515831
Mathematics.

Structural Validity and Reliability of Two Observation Protocols in College Mathematics.
LDR:03037nmm a2200325 4500 001 2155375
005 20180426091045.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369872361
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10262898
035 $a (MiAaPQ)alatus:13086
035 $a AAI10262898
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Watley, Laura Erin. $3 3343112
245 1 0 $a Structural Validity and Reliability of Two Observation Protocols in College Mathematics.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 117 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Jim Gleason.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Alabama, 2017.
520 $a Undergraduate mathematics education is being challenged to improve, with peer evaluation, student evaluations, and portfolio assessments as the primary methods of formative and summative assessment used by instructors. Observation protocols like the Mathematics Classroom Observation Protocol for Practices (MCOP2) and the abbreviated Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (aRTOP) are another alternative. However, before these observation protocols can be used in the classroom with confidence, a study needed to be conducted to examine both the aRTOP and the MCOP2. This study was conducted at three large doctorate-granting universities and eight masters and baccalaureate institutions. Both the aRTOP and the MCOP2 were evaluated in 110 classroom observations during the Spring 2016, Fall 2016, and Spring 2017 semesters. The data analysis allowed conclusions regarding the internal structure, internal reliability, and relationship between the constructs measured by both observation protocols.
520 $a The factor loadings and fit indices produced from a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) found a stronger internal structure of the MCOP 2. Cronbach's alpha was also calculated to analyze the internal reliability for each subscale of both protocols. All alphas were in the satisfactory range for the MCOP2 and below the satisfactory range for the aRTOP. Linear Regression analysis was also conducted to estimate the relationship between the constructs of both protocols. We found a positive and strong correlation between each pair of constructs with a higher correlation between subscales that do not contain Content Propositional Knowledge. This leads us to believe that Content Propositional Knowledge of the aRTOP is measuring something completely different, but not very well, and it needs to be assessed using another method. As noted above and detailed in the body of the work, we find support for the Mathematics Classroom Observation Protocol for Practices (MCOP2) as a useful assessment tool for undergraduate mathematics classrooms.
590 $a School code: 0004.
650 4 $a Mathematics. $3 515831
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Applied mathematics. $3 2122814
690 $a 0405
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0364
710 2 $a The University of Alabama. $b Mathematics. $3 3343113
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-11B(E).
790 $a 0004
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10262898