東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Intellectual Property, Traditional K...

Gebru, Aman.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge, and Bioprospecting: Searching for Efficient Balance of Rights.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge, and Bioprospecting: Searching for Efficient Balance of Rights./
作者:	Gebru, Aman.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	351 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-05A(E).
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10242371
ISBN:	9780355490473

Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge, and Bioprospecting: Searching for Efficient Balance of Rights.
Gebru, Aman.

Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge, and Bioprospecting: Searching for Efficient Balance of Rights. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 351 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2017.

The dissertation comprises five chapters examining interrelated legal and economic aspects of the protection of Traditional Knowledge (TK). Chapter One describes the value that Traditional Medicinal Knowledge (TMK) has and the alarming rate of loss it faces. The chapter outlines the various issues of contention from defining 'traditional knowledge,' to the argument surrounding if and how TK should be protected. Chapter Two examines economic rationales for the need to protect TK through the lens of the public goods literature. It outlines the three key causes of TK loss and alternative methods of producing TK. Building on such discussion, Chapter Three develops the 'incentive to codify' argument which forms a core part of the thesis, as distinguished from the currently dominant 'incentive to conserve' rationale. The chapter discusses existing piecemeal attempts to codify TK and posits that a proactive use of such database will enable these initiatives to realize their real potential. Chapter four outlines the legal framework which may be justified given the public goods nature of TMK and the need to codify and disclose it to users. It advocates for the establishment of a bioprospecting right which can reflect the interest of TK holders and users. It also outlines what form TK codification should take. Lastly, Chapter Five examines whether an international TK protection mechanism is necessary. It outlines existing international deliberations on TK protection including the Draft Articles of the World Intellectual Property Organization, Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (WIPO IGC). The chapter concludes with analysis of the key features that an international forum should consider to provide baseline protection.

ISBN: 9780355490473Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge, and Bioprospecting: Searching for Efficient Balance of Rights.
LDR:02856nmm a2200313 4500 001 2155302
005 20180426091042.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355490473
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10242371
035 $a (MiAaPQ)toronto:15052
035 $a AAI10242371
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gebru, Aman. $3 3343041
245 1 0 $a Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge, and Bioprospecting: Searching for Efficient Balance of Rights.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 351 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Adviser: Ariel Katz.
502 $a Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2017.
520 $a The dissertation comprises five chapters examining interrelated legal and economic aspects of the protection of Traditional Knowledge (TK). Chapter One describes the value that Traditional Medicinal Knowledge (TMK) has and the alarming rate of loss it faces. The chapter outlines the various issues of contention from defining 'traditional knowledge,' to the argument surrounding if and how TK should be protected. Chapter Two examines economic rationales for the need to protect TK through the lens of the public goods literature. It outlines the three key causes of TK loss and alternative methods of producing TK. Building on such discussion, Chapter Three develops the 'incentive to codify' argument which forms a core part of the thesis, as distinguished from the currently dominant 'incentive to conserve' rationale. The chapter discusses existing piecemeal attempts to codify TK and posits that a proactive use of such database will enable these initiatives to realize their real potential. Chapter four outlines the legal framework which may be justified given the public goods nature of TMK and the need to codify and disclose it to users. It advocates for the establishment of a bioprospecting right which can reflect the interest of TK holders and users. It also outlines what form TK codification should take. Lastly, Chapter Five examines whether an international TK protection mechanism is necessary. It outlines existing international deliberations on TK protection including the Draft Articles of the World Intellectual Property Organization, Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (WIPO IGC). The chapter concludes with analysis of the key features that an international forum should consider to provide baseline protection.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Law. $3 2093829
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-05A(E).
790 $a 0779
791 $a S.J.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10242371