東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Examining Teacher Perceptions of the...

Frasier, Amanda Marie Slaten.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Examining Teacher Perceptions of the Relationship Between Evaluation Policy and Teacher Practice in a North Carolina School System.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Examining Teacher Perceptions of the Relationship Between Evaluation Policy and Teacher Practice in a North Carolina School System./
作者:	Frasier, Amanda Marie Slaten.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	208 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-03A(E).
標題:	Education policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10684225
ISBN:	9780355509328

Examining Teacher Perceptions of the Relationship Between Evaluation Policy and Teacher Practice in a North Carolina School System.
Frasier, Amanda Marie Slaten.

Examining Teacher Perceptions of the Relationship Between Evaluation Policy and Teacher Practice in a North Carolina School System. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 208 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2017.

Examining the justification for current evaluation policy reveals that such policy rests on two assumptions related to the impact on the work of teachers: (1) evaluations are necessary because teachers need to be rated, sanctioned, or rewarded in order to be motivated to improve their practice; and (2) evaluations yield information that is useful for teachers to improve practice. Both assumptions have driven policy changes over time and carry implications for teacher classroom practice.

ISBN: 9780355509328Subjects--Topical Terms:

2191387
Education policy.

Examining Teacher Perceptions of the Relationship Between Evaluation Policy and Teacher Practice in a North Carolina School System.
LDR:04425nmm a2200373 4500 001 2155012
005 20180426101950.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355509328
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10684225
035 $a (MiAaPQ)grad.msu:15733
035 $a AAI10684225
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Frasier, Amanda Marie Slaten. $3 3342760
245 1 0 $a Examining Teacher Perceptions of the Relationship Between Evaluation Policy and Teacher Practice in a North Carolina School System.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 208 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Anne-Lise F. Halverson; Peter Youngs.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2017.
520 $a Examining the justification for current evaluation policy reveals that such policy rests on two assumptions related to the impact on the work of teachers: (1) evaluations are necessary because teachers need to be rated, sanctioned, or rewarded in order to be motivated to improve their practice; and (2) evaluations yield information that is useful for teachers to improve practice. Both assumptions have driven policy changes over time and carry implications for teacher classroom practice.
520 $a This mixed methods study examines how a state-wide standardized evaluation policy utilized in North Carolina affects the work of high school teachers in a single school district under varying school and individual conditions. Specifically, this study focuses on teachers who offer perspectives from varying combinations of the following school-level variables: status at a high or low evaluation condition school and status at a high or low evaluation effectiveness school, and the following individual variables: status as a Mathematics or English teacher, years of experience, and licensure level.
520 $a This dissertation tests the previously-stated assumptions about teacher evaluation and teacher work in a North Carolina school system in a to answer the following research questions:
520 $a (1) What, if any, role do reported school evaluation conditions and school evaluation status play in shaping teacher motivation, experiences with feedback, and work decisions related to teacher evaluation?
520 $a (2) What individual-teacher level factors are associated with differences in teacher motivation, experiences with feedback, and work decisions related to teacher evaluation?
520 $a Analysis of the whole sample demonstrated that teachers did not find evaluation to motivate performance or to provide useful feedback. Though quantitative differences between school locations were not found, there were qualitative differences in how evaluation was related to practice across sites. Differences were also found in the evaluation-practice relationship between teachers of different licensure levels and different levels of experience where those in the lower designation perceived a greater impact of evaluation policy. Finally, differences between the subject areas of Math and English were identified, but may have been influenced by the capacity of observers and specifically, a lack of subject area alignment between the observer and the classroom in English, such alignment was present for some of the Math teachers in the study. Therefore, it is important to examine the context of evaluation, particularly the capacity of the administration that conducts evaluation.
520 $a The results of this study suggest that the characteristics and capacity of an observer do matter in how the observation protocol is interpreted and implemented. Additionally, the evaluation climate and culture, or evaluation scenario of a school, may also influence the ways in which teachers find evaluation motivating and how teachers approach feedback from evaluation. The results of this study provide insight into the relationship between teacher evaluation and classroom practice, an area that has previously been under researched despite the impact other high-stakes accountability policies have had on teaching practices and the teaching workforce.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0443
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Educational Policy. $3 2097019
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-03A(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10684225