東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Assistant Principals' Perceptions of...

Ragone, Matthew J.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Assistant Principals' Perceptions of Student Progress Goals and Their Impact on Instructional Leadership.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Assistant Principals' Perceptions of Student Progress Goals and Their Impact on Instructional Leadership./
作者:	Ragone, Matthew J.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	208 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-04A(E).
標題:	Education policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10284736
ISBN:	9780355411232

Assistant Principals' Perceptions of Student Progress Goals and Their Impact on Instructional Leadership.
Ragone, Matthew J.

Assistant Principals' Perceptions of Student Progress Goals and Their Impact on Instructional Leadership. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 208 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2017.

This study examines high school assistant principals' perceptions of a single, large, suburban school district's student achievement-based teacher evaluation policy, and how the policy interacts with their instructional leadership capacity. As the result of accountability policies within No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Race to the Top (RttT), districts across the nation have adopted teacher evaluation policies that attempt to hold teachers directly accountable for their student's achievement. Such policies, including the one under study, require 40% of teachers' final ratings include some measure of student progress. This district defined student achievement through teacher created, student progress goals (SPGs). In order to examine how this policy is perceived and implemented at the ground level, I interviewed 16 high school assistant principals from a variety of schools in District A. I found that a majority of these assistant principals did not consider SPGs essential to assessing teacher quality or for holding teachers accountable for student achievement. I also found that assistant principals' unrestricted authority, and the presence of school teams, such as collaborative teams (CTs), impacted SPG policy implementation to the extent that the policy was modified. Finally, I found that SPG policy had a positive impact on participants' instructional leadership capacity because it created opportunities for assistant principals to have data conversations with teachers who were able to monitor struggling students, including students of ESOL and special education subgroups.

ISBN: 9780355411232Subjects--Topical Terms:

2191387
Education policy.

Assistant Principals' Perceptions of Student Progress Goals and Their Impact on Instructional Leadership.
LDR:02591nmm a2200313 4500 001 2154926
005 20180426101948.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355411232
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10284736
035 $a (MiAaPQ)gmu:11492
035 $a AAI10284736
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ragone, Matthew J. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-5601-2866 $3 3342664
245 1 0 $a Assistant Principals' Perceptions of Student Progress Goals and Their Impact on Instructional Leadership.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 208 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Diana D'Amico.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2017.
520 $a This study examines high school assistant principals' perceptions of a single, large, suburban school district's student achievement-based teacher evaluation policy, and how the policy interacts with their instructional leadership capacity. As the result of accountability policies within No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Race to the Top (RttT), districts across the nation have adopted teacher evaluation policies that attempt to hold teachers directly accountable for their student's achievement. Such policies, including the one under study, require 40% of teachers' final ratings include some measure of student progress. This district defined student achievement through teacher created, student progress goals (SPGs). In order to examine how this policy is perceived and implemented at the ground level, I interviewed 16 high school assistant principals from a variety of schools in District A. I found that a majority of these assistant principals did not consider SPGs essential to assessing teacher quality or for holding teachers accountable for student achievement. I also found that assistant principals' unrestricted authority, and the presence of school teams, such as collaborative teams (CTs), impacted SPG policy implementation to the extent that the policy was modified. Finally, I found that SPG policy had a positive impact on participants' instructional leadership capacity because it created opportunities for assistant principals to have data conversations with teachers who were able to monitor struggling students, including students of ESOL and special education subgroups.
590 $a School code: 0883.
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0514
710 2 $a George Mason University. $b Education. $3 2095189
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-04A(E).
790 $a 0883
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10284736