東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

De-moralizing gay rights = some quee...

Ghosh, Cyril.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

De-moralizing gay rights = some queer remarks on LGBT+ rights politics in the US /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	De-moralizing gay rights/ by Cyril Ghosh.
其他題名:	some queer remarks on LGBT+ rights politics in the US /
作者:	Ghosh, Cyril.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2018.,
面頁冊數:	ix, 112 p. :digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	1. De-Moralizing Gay Rights -- 2. Radical Theory Creep -- 3. Obergefell v. Hodges: Marriage Equality's Insistence on Family Values -- 4. Covering's Other Hidden Assault -- 5. Epilogue.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Gay rights - United States. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78840-1
ISBN:	9783319788401

De-moralizing gay rights = some queer remarks on LGBT+ rights politics in the US /
Ghosh, Cyril.

De-moralizing gay rightssome queer remarks on LGBT+ rights politics in the US /[electronic resource] :by Cyril Ghosh. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - ix, 112 p. :digital ;24 cm.

1. De-Moralizing Gay Rights -- 2. Radical Theory Creep -- 3. Obergefell v. Hodges: Marriage Equality's Insistence on Family Values -- 4. Covering's Other Hidden Assault -- 5. Epilogue.

This book critically interrogates three sets of distortions that emanate from the messianic core of 21st century public discourse on LGBT+ rights in the United States. The first relates to the critique of pinkwashing, often advanced by scholars who claim to be committed to an emancipatory politics. The second concerns a recent US Supreme Court decision, Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), a judgment that established marriage equality across the 50 states. The third distortion occurs in Kenji Yoshino's theorization of the concept of gay covering. Each distortion produces its own injunction to assimilate, sometimes into the dominant mainstream and, at other times, into the fold of what is axiomatically taken to be the category of the radical. Using a queer theoretic analysis, I argue for the dismantling of each of these three sets of assimilationist injunctions.

ISBN: 9783319788401

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-78840-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

584133
Gay rights
--United States.

LC Class. No.: HQ76.8.U5 / G467 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 305.90664

De-moralizing gay rights = some queer remarks on LGBT+ rights politics in the US /
LDR:02063nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2146346
003 DE-He213
005 20181207133153.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 190227s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319788401 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319788395 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-78840-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-78840-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a HQ76.8.U5 $b G467 2018
072 7 $a JP $2 bicssc
072 7 $a 1KBB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL040000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 305.90664 $2 23
090 $a HQ76.8.U5 $b G427 2018
100 1 $a Ghosh, Cyril. $3 1977184
245 1 0 $a De-moralizing gay rights $h [electronic resource] : $b some queer remarks on LGBT+ rights politics in the US / $c by Cyril Ghosh.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Pivot, $c 2018.
300 $a ix, 112 p. : $b digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. De-Moralizing Gay Rights -- 2. Radical Theory Creep -- 3. Obergefell v. Hodges: Marriage Equality's Insistence on Family Values -- 4. Covering's Other Hidden Assault -- 5. Epilogue.
520 $a This book critically interrogates three sets of distortions that emanate from the messianic core of 21st century public discourse on LGBT+ rights in the United States. The first relates to the critique of pinkwashing, often advanced by scholars who claim to be committed to an emancipatory politics. The second concerns a recent US Supreme Court decision, Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), a judgment that established marriage equality across the 50 states. The third distortion occurs in Kenji Yoshino's theorization of the concept of gay covering. Each distortion produces its own injunction to assimilate, sometimes into the dominant mainstream and, at other times, into the fold of what is axiomatically taken to be the category of the radical. Using a queer theoretic analysis, I argue for the dismantling of each of these three sets of assimilationist injunctions.
650 0 $a Gay rights $z United States. $3 584133
650 1 4 $a Political Science and International Relations. $3 2162818
650 2 4 $a US Politics. $3 2182240
650 2 4 $a Public Policy. $3 736292
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78840-1
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (Springer-41174)