東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Rethinking the three R's in animal r...

Lauwereyns, Jan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Rethinking the three R's in animal research = replacement, reduction, refinement /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rethinking the three R's in animal research/ by Jan Lauwereyns.
其他題名:	replacement, reduction, refinement /
作者:	Lauwereyns, Jan.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2018.,
面頁冊數:	viii, 134 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	1. Concept Fatigue with the Three Rs -- 2. A Mismatch between Micromotives and Macrobehavior -- 3. The Monkey Question -- 4. If Not Replacement, then Agreement -- 5. Conclusion.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Laboratory animals - Research. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89300-6
ISBN:	9783319893006

Rethinking the three R's in animal research = replacement, reduction, refinement /
Lauwereyns, Jan.

Rethinking the three R's in animal researchreplacement, reduction, refinement /[electronic resource] :by Jan Lauwereyns. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - viii, 134 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Concept Fatigue with the Three Rs -- 2. A Mismatch between Micromotives and Macrobehavior -- 3. The Monkey Question -- 4. If Not Replacement, then Agreement -- 5. Conclusion.

This work challenges the current reliance on "The Three R's" or Replacement, Reduction and Refinement which direct most animal research in the behavioral sciences. The author argues that these principles that were developed in the 1950's to guide the use of animals in research studies are outdated. He suggests that the notions of refinement and reduction are often ill-defined and can be useful only in cases where replacement is impossible.

ISBN: 9783319893006

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-89300-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3307711
Laboratory animals
--Research.

LC Class. No.: QL55 / .L389 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 636.0885

Rethinking the three R's in animal research = replacement, reduction, refinement /
LDR:01598nmm a2200313 a 4500 001 2136376
003 DE-He213
005 20180830153840.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 181117s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319893006 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319892993 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-89300-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-89300-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a QL55 $b .L389 2018
072 7 $a JMR $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY008000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 636.0885 $2 23
090 $a QL55 $b .L391 2018
100 1 $a Lauwereyns, Jan. $3 3307710
245 1 0 $a Rethinking the three R's in animal research $h [electronic resource] : $b replacement, reduction, refinement / $c by Jan Lauwereyns.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Pivot, $c 2018.
300 $a viii, 134 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Concept Fatigue with the Three Rs -- 2. A Mismatch between Micromotives and Macrobehavior -- 3. The Monkey Question -- 4. If Not Replacement, then Agreement -- 5. Conclusion.
520 $a This work challenges the current reliance on "The Three R's" or Replacement, Reduction and Refinement which direct most animal research in the behavioral sciences. The author argues that these principles that were developed in the 1950's to guide the use of animals in research studies are outdated. He suggests that the notions of refinement and reduction are often ill-defined and can be useful only in cases where replacement is impossible.
650 0 $a Laboratory animals $x Research. $3 3307711
650 0 $a Medicine $x Research. $3 761568
650 1 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 2 4 $a Cognitive Psychology. $3 891220
650 2 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 588700
650 2 4 $a Bioethics. $3 558486
650 2 4 $a Psychological Methods/Evaluation. $3 899288
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89300-6
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (Springer-41168)