東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Truth in fiction = rethinking its lo...

Woods, John.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Truth in fiction = rethinking its logic : the Istanbul lectures /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Truth in fiction/ by John Woods.
其他題名:	rethinking its logic : the Istanbul lectures /
作者:	Woods, John.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2018.,
面頁冊數:	xiv, 239 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Fictions, Theory of. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72658-8
ISBN:	9783319726588

Truth in fiction = rethinking its logic : the Istanbul lectures /
Woods, John.

Truth in fictionrethinking its logic : the Istanbul lectures /[electronic resource] :by John Woods. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - xiv, 239 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Synthese library ;v.391. - Synthese library ;v.391..

This monograph examines truth in fiction by applying the techniques of a naturalized logic of human cognitive practices. The author structures his project around two focal questions. What would it take to write a book about truth in literary discourse with reasonable promise of getting it right? What would it take to write a book about truth in fiction as true to the facts of lived literary experience as objectivity allows? It is argued that the most semantically distinctive feature of the sentences of fiction is that they are unambiguously true and false together. It is true that Sherlock Holmes lived at 221B Baker Street and also concurrently false that he did. A second distinctive feature of fiction is that the reader at large knows of this inconsistency and isn't in the least cognitively molested by it. Why, it is asked, would this be so? What would explain it? Two answers are developed. According to the no-contradiction thesis, the semantically tangled sentences of fiction are indeed logically inconsistent but not logically contradictory. According to the no-bother thesis, if the inconsistencies of fiction were contradictory, a properly contrived logic for the rational management of inconsistency would explain why readers at large are not thrown off cognitive stride by their embrace of those contradictions. As developed here, the account of fiction suggests the presence of an underlying three - or four-valued dialethic logic. The author shows this to be a mistaken impression. There are only two truth-values in his logic of fiction. The naturalized logic of Truth in Fiction jettisons some of the standard assumptions and analytical tools of contemporary philosophy, chiefly because the neurotypical linguistic and cognitive behaviour of humanity at large is at variance with them. Using the resources of a causal response epistemology in tandem with the naturalized logic, the theory produced here is data-driven, empirically sensitive, and open to a circumspect collaboration with the empirical sciences of language and cognition.

ISBN: 9783319726588

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-72658-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

562867
Fictions, Theory of.

LC Class. No.: BC199.F5

Dewey Class. No.: 149.94

Truth in fiction = rethinking its logic : the Istanbul lectures /
LDR:03061nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2134239
003 DE-He213
005 20180223165321.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 181005s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319726588 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319726571 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-72658-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-72658-8
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BC199.F5
072 7 $a CFA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI021000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAN000000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 149.94 $2 23
090 $a BC199.F5 $b W895 2018
100 1 $a Woods, John. $3 864496
245 1 0 $a Truth in fiction $h [electronic resource] : $b rethinking its logic : the Istanbul lectures / $c by John Woods.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a xiv, 239 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Synthese library ; $v v.391
520 $a This monograph examines truth in fiction by applying the techniques of a naturalized logic of human cognitive practices. The author structures his project around two focal questions. What would it take to write a book about truth in literary discourse with reasonable promise of getting it right? What would it take to write a book about truth in fiction as true to the facts of lived literary experience as objectivity allows? It is argued that the most semantically distinctive feature of the sentences of fiction is that they are unambiguously true and false together. It is true that Sherlock Holmes lived at 221B Baker Street and also concurrently false that he did. A second distinctive feature of fiction is that the reader at large knows of this inconsistency and isn't in the least cognitively molested by it. Why, it is asked, would this be so? What would explain it? Two answers are developed. According to the no-contradiction thesis, the semantically tangled sentences of fiction are indeed logically inconsistent but not logically contradictory. According to the no-bother thesis, if the inconsistencies of fiction were contradictory, a properly contrived logic for the rational management of inconsistency would explain why readers at large are not thrown off cognitive stride by their embrace of those contradictions. As developed here, the account of fiction suggests the presence of an underlying three - or four-valued dialethic logic. The author shows this to be a mistaken impression. There are only two truth-values in his logic of fiction. The naturalized logic of Truth in Fiction jettisons some of the standard assumptions and analytical tools of contemporary philosophy, chiefly because the neurotypical linguistic and cognitive behaviour of humanity at large is at variance with them. Using the resources of a causal response epistemology in tandem with the naturalized logic, the theory produced here is data-driven, empirically sensitive, and open to a circumspect collaboration with the empirical sciences of language and cognition.
650 0 $a Fictions, Theory of. $3 562867
650 0 $a Truth. $3 526877
650 0 $a Logic. $3 529544
650 0 $a Language and languages $x Philosophy. $3 524977
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Language. $3 896994
650 2 4 $a Fiction. $3 533979
650 2 4 $a Language and Literature. $3 2180511
650 2 4 $a Personality and Social Psychology. $3 1001451
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Synthese library ; $v v.391. $3 3302500
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72658-8
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)