東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Comparing accountability models: Out...

Spalter, Amanda N.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparing accountability models: Outcomes for English language learners by English language proficiency level.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparing accountability models: Outcomes for English language learners by English language proficiency level./
作者:	Spalter, Amanda N.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	196 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-09A(E).
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3703041
ISBN:	9781321746495

Comparing accountability models: Outcomes for English language learners by English language proficiency level.
Spalter, Amanda N.

Comparing accountability models: Outcomes for English language learners by English language proficiency level. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 196 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2015.

The No Child Left Behind Act has led to increased federal requirements and sanctions related to student achievement outcomes. As reauthorization of the legislation approaches, researchers and policymakers have increasingly raised concerns about the appropriateness of current accountability models for all students and in particular for students labeled English language learners (ELLs). Differentiated status models and growth models have been suggested as a less biased and more stable way to account for ELLs' learning on standardized assessments. This study compares growth models and status models to analyze the percentages of students that are making average growth or meeting proficiency for ELLs at different English language proficiency levels compared to other student subgroups. The data analyzed include longitudinal results from a large-scale mathematics assessment for students in 3rd -- 5 th grades from one Midwestern state. Outcomes from the different models are compared to investigate the consistency of conclusions across models for (a) students with matched and unmatched data, (b) student subgroups, and (c) school effects. Results indicated that ELLs who are redesignated as English proficient relatively outperform all other subgroups across all models tested. Also, growth models seem to have relatively more similar outcomes for ELLs and other subgroups compared to status models. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed..

ISBN: 9781321746495Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.

Comparing accountability models: Outcomes for English language learners by English language proficiency level.
LDR:02469nmm a2200313 4500 001 2128327
005 20180105074638.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321746495
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3703041
035 $a AAI3703041
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Spalter, Amanda N. $3 3290500
245 1 0 $a Comparing accountability models: Outcomes for English language learners by English language proficiency level.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 196 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Craig A. Albers.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2015.
520 $a The No Child Left Behind Act has led to increased federal requirements and sanctions related to student achievement outcomes. As reauthorization of the legislation approaches, researchers and policymakers have increasingly raised concerns about the appropriateness of current accountability models for all students and in particular for students labeled English language learners (ELLs). Differentiated status models and growth models have been suggested as a less biased and more stable way to account for ELLs' learning on standardized assessments. This study compares growth models and status models to analyze the percentages of students that are making average growth or meeting proficiency for ELLs at different English language proficiency levels compared to other student subgroups. The data analyzed include longitudinal results from a large-scale mathematics assessment for students in 3rd -- 5 th grades from one Midwestern state. Outcomes from the different models are compared to investigate the consistency of conclusions across models for (a) students with matched and unmatched data, (b) student subgroups, and (c) school effects. Results indicated that ELLs who are redesignated as English proficient relatively outperform all other subgroups across all models tested. Also, growth models seem to have relatively more similar outcomes for ELLs and other subgroups compared to status models. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed..
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0443
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b Educational Psychology. $3 3170079
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-09A(E).
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3703041