東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The interaction of lexical and disco...

Teague, Kimberly.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The interaction of lexical and discourse-level categories in second language phonetics.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The interaction of lexical and discourse-level categories in second language phonetics./
作者:	Teague, Kimberly.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2011,
面頁冊數:	205 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1391.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International73-04A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3490423
ISBN:	9781267111562

The interaction of lexical and discourse-level categories in second language phonetics.
Teague, Kimberly.

The interaction of lexical and discourse-level categories in second language phonetics. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2011 - 205 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1391.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2011.

This dissertation examines the interaction between lexical and discourse level categories in second language speech; specifically, the interaction of tone and intonation in the speech of Mandarin learners of English. The topic is investigated by analyzing recordings of 14 monolingual speakers of Mandarin, 16 Mandarin-English bilinguals, and 16 monolingual speakers of English producing word-lists, and statements and questions in both languages. The following questions are addressed:

ISBN: 9781267111562Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.

The interaction of lexical and discourse-level categories in second language phonetics.
LDR:03321nmm a2200349 4500 001 2127974
005 20180105074627.5
008 180830s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267111562
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3490423
035 $a AAI3490423
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Teague, Kimberly. $3 3290144
245 1 4 $a The interaction of lexical and discourse-level categories in second language phonetics.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2011
300 $a 205 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1391.
500 $a Adviser: Elizabeth Zsiga.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2011.
520 $a This dissertation examines the interaction between lexical and discourse level categories in second language speech; specifically, the interaction of tone and intonation in the speech of Mandarin learners of English. The topic is investigated by analyzing recordings of 14 monolingual speakers of Mandarin, 16 Mandarin-English bilinguals, and 16 monolingual speakers of English producing word-lists, and statements and questions in both languages. The following questions are addressed:
520 $a (1) Does the Speech Learning Model (SLM) extend to tone and intonation?
520 $a The SLM predicts merger of L1 and L2 segmental categories, but has never been expanded to the suprasegmental level. The predictions of the SLM at both levels were tested here by examining Voice Onset Time (VOT) of Mandarin /p h/ and English /p/, timing of F0 peak in Mandarin H and English H*L, and rate of declination in word-lists. Mandarin-English speakers produced both Mandarin-like and English-like phonetic variants in both languages. Thus, a bidirectional interaction that was similar to segmental interaction was found between Mandarin tone and English intonation. The category merger predicted by the SLM was not found, however, at either the segmental or suprasegmental level.
520 $a (2) Which model of tone and intonation, the Autosegmental Metrical (AM) or the Parallel Encoding and Target Approximation (PENTA) model, best accounts for Mandarin-English intonation?
520 $a It is argued that the findings of this study are best accounted for by AM because (a) tone and intonation interact bi-directionally at the phonetic level, and (b) Mandarin-English intonation can be accounted for through sequences of level tones.
520 $a Two different intonation patterns were found in Mandarin-English statements and questions. In the first pattern, a L boundary tone (L#) marked the right edge of every contrastive focus word in statements and questions; these utterances also had a low post-focus pitch register. In the second pattern, the L# was found in statements, but a H boundary tone occurred in questions; statements had a low post-focus pitch register, while questions had a high one. It is suggested that, since pitch register is predictable from tonal pattern, only tones need be represented to account for Mandarin-English intonation, consistent with an AM account.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Linguistics. $3 1026493
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 73-04A.
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3490423