東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparison of heavy-to-light vs. lig...

Fiorilli, Sal.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of heavy-to-light vs. light-to-heavy resistance training methods.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparison of heavy-to-light vs. light-to-heavy resistance training methods./
Author:	Fiorilli, Sal.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2012,
Description:	80 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 50-06, page: 3553.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International50-06.
Subject:	Physical education. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1513189
ISBN:	9781267422293

Comparison of heavy-to-light vs. light-to-heavy resistance training methods.
Fiorilli, Sal.

Comparison of heavy-to-light vs. light-to-heavy resistance training methods. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2012 - 80 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 50-06, page: 3553.

Thesis (M.S.)--Kean University, 2012.

Light-to-heavy (LTH or ascending pyramid) and heavy-to-light (HTL or descending pyramid) resistance training protocols have been investigated and used to improve muscular strength, power and endurance. Previous studies which compared LTH and HTL protocols utilized a 10RM pre-test for prescribed training loads, but this study utilized a 1RM pre-test. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in muscular strength and endurance by performing either an ascending or descending 3 set protocol based on pre-tested 1RM. Eleven (n = 11) male high school wrestlers, ages 14--17 years, participated in a resistance training program twice-per-week on non-consecutive days for 8 weeks. A mixed-between-within ANOVA analysis was used to examine pre-test and post-test differences in 1RM muscular strength and muscular endurance (reps with 90% of 1RM) on vertical bench press and leg press machines. The level of significance was set at (p < 0.05). Pre-test to post-test differences in 1RM were as follows: vertical bench press showed no differences within groups or between groups. Leg press was significant in LTH, HTL and Control groups (p = .002), with the LTH group showing significantly higher post-test scores (p = .036), but the HTL group showing a trend toward significance (p = 0.4) from pre-test to post-test. Number of reps performed during initial session compared to peak session with 90% of 1RM were as follows: Both LTH and HTL groups showed significance on vertical bench press. No significant between-group differences were found, but a trend toward significance (p = .1) was found (favoring HTL group). Both LTH and HTL groups showed significance on leg press, but no between-group differences were found. Possible trends toward significance found in this study seem to suggest performing a 3 set HTL protocol based upon a 1RM pre-test may be more beneficial than performing a LTH protocol for improving 1RM leg press strength and 90% of 1RM vertical bench press muscular endurance, but more research and larger sample sizes are needed to determine this.

ISBN: 9781267422293Subjects--Topical Terms:

635343
Physical education.

Comparison of heavy-to-light vs. light-to-heavy resistance training methods.
LDR:02977nmm a2200301 4500 001 2127799
005 20180105074621.5
008 180830s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267422293
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1513189
035 $a AAI1513189
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fiorilli, Sal. $3 3289968
245 1 0 $a Comparison of heavy-to-light vs. light-to-heavy resistance training methods.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2012
300 $a 80 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 50-06, page: 3553.
500 $a Adviser: Walter D. Andzel.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Kean University, 2012.
520 $a Light-to-heavy (LTH or ascending pyramid) and heavy-to-light (HTL or descending pyramid) resistance training protocols have been investigated and used to improve muscular strength, power and endurance. Previous studies which compared LTH and HTL protocols utilized a 10RM pre-test for prescribed training loads, but this study utilized a 1RM pre-test. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in muscular strength and endurance by performing either an ascending or descending 3 set protocol based on pre-tested 1RM. Eleven (n = 11) male high school wrestlers, ages 14--17 years, participated in a resistance training program twice-per-week on non-consecutive days for 8 weeks. A mixed-between-within ANOVA analysis was used to examine pre-test and post-test differences in 1RM muscular strength and muscular endurance (reps with 90% of 1RM) on vertical bench press and leg press machines. The level of significance was set at (p < 0.05). Pre-test to post-test differences in 1RM were as follows: vertical bench press showed no differences within groups or between groups. Leg press was significant in LTH, HTL and Control groups (p = .002), with the LTH group showing significantly higher post-test scores (p = .036), but the HTL group showing a trend toward significance (p = 0.4) from pre-test to post-test. Number of reps performed during initial session compared to peak session with 90% of 1RM were as follows: Both LTH and HTL groups showed significance on vertical bench press. No significant between-group differences were found, but a trend toward significance (p = .1) was found (favoring HTL group). Both LTH and HTL groups showed significance on leg press, but no between-group differences were found. Possible trends toward significance found in this study seem to suggest performing a 3 set HTL protocol based upon a 1RM pre-test may be more beneficial than performing a LTH protocol for improving 1RM leg press strength and 90% of 1RM vertical bench press muscular endurance, but more research and larger sample sizes are needed to determine this.
590 $a School code: 1499.
650 4 $a Physical education. $3 635343
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Physiology. $3 518431
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0719
710 2 $a Kean University. $b Exercise Science. $3 3289969
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 50-06.
790 $a 1499
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1513189