東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Grounding Statement Analysis in Ling...

Stroope, Kristina.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Grounding Statement Analysis in Linguistic Theories and Methods.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Grounding Statement Analysis in Linguistic Theories and Methods./
作者:	Stroope, Kristina.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	101 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-04(E).
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10285117
ISBN:	9781369802245

Grounding Statement Analysis in Linguistic Theories and Methods.
Stroope, Kristina.

Grounding Statement Analysis in Linguistic Theories and Methods. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 101 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--Hofstra University, 2017.

Statement Analysis is a method used by law enforcement that aims to discover whether a person is being deceptive or truthful in his or her written statement. This study examined the Statement Analysis features supported in literature by seven or more scholars and practitioners: First Person Singular Pronoun, Text Bridges, Balance of Statement Structure, Inappropriate Verb Tense, Group Pronouns, Extraneous Details, Qualifiers, Account of Emotions Throughout and/or After the Climax, Spontaneous Negations, and Temporal and Spatial Contextual Embedding. The research question is: how can linguistic theories and established linguistic analysis methods help explain the linguistic features flagged as deceptive or truthful language in criminal investigators' Statement Analysis? It is hypothesized that the ten most advocated features in Statement Analysis can be explained through two major linguistic theories: Cooperative Principle and Speech Act Theory. Also hypothesized is that the application of Critical Discourse Analysis, Genre Analysis, Narrative Analysis, and Appraisal Analysis can provide a parallel analysis to Statement Analysis, but these analysis methods allow the analyst to uncover more underlying meaning than Statement Analysis. Results showed that every feature could be explained through linguistic theory except Account of Emotions Throughout and/or After the Climax, and linguistics only partially supported the First Person Singular Pronoun criterion while partly discounting the Inappropriate Verb Tense criterion. Implications of the research are discussed.

ISBN: 9781369802245Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.

Grounding Statement Analysis in Linguistic Theories and Methods.
LDR:02473nmm a2200301 4500 001 2127098
005 20171206144946.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369802245
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10285117
035 $a AAI10285117
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Stroope, Kristina. $3 3289211
245 1 0 $a Grounding Statement Analysis in Linguistic Theories and Methods.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 101 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
500 $a Adviser: Tammy A. Gales.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Hofstra University, 2017.
520 $a Statement Analysis is a method used by law enforcement that aims to discover whether a person is being deceptive or truthful in his or her written statement. This study examined the Statement Analysis features supported in literature by seven or more scholars and practitioners: First Person Singular Pronoun, Text Bridges, Balance of Statement Structure, Inappropriate Verb Tense, Group Pronouns, Extraneous Details, Qualifiers, Account of Emotions Throughout and/or After the Climax, Spontaneous Negations, and Temporal and Spatial Contextual Embedding. The research question is: how can linguistic theories and established linguistic analysis methods help explain the linguistic features flagged as deceptive or truthful language in criminal investigators' Statement Analysis? It is hypothesized that the ten most advocated features in Statement Analysis can be explained through two major linguistic theories: Cooperative Principle and Speech Act Theory. Also hypothesized is that the application of Critical Discourse Analysis, Genre Analysis, Narrative Analysis, and Appraisal Analysis can provide a parallel analysis to Statement Analysis, but these analysis methods allow the analyst to uncover more underlying meaning than Statement Analysis. Results showed that every feature could be explained through linguistic theory except Account of Emotions Throughout and/or After the Climax, and linguistics only partially supported the First Person Singular Pronoun criterion while partly discounting the Inappropriate Verb Tense criterion. Implications of the research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0086.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Sociolinguistics. $3 524467
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0636
690 $a 0627
710 2 $a Hofstra University. $b Forensic Linguistics. $3 3289212
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-04(E).
790 $a 0086
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10285117