東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Foundations of a Scientific Cognitiv...

Bronsted, John C.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Foundations of a Scientific Cognitive Theory for Literary Criticism.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Foundations of a Scientific Cognitive Theory for Literary Criticism./
作者:	Bronsted, John C.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	117 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-10A(E).
標題:	Comparative literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10610481
ISBN:	9781369849134

Foundations of a Scientific Cognitive Theory for Literary Criticism.
Bronsted, John C.

Foundations of a Scientific Cognitive Theory for Literary Criticism. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 117 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2017.

Based on Noam Chomsky's argument that the faculty of language is primarily a tool of thought whose purpose is to interpret the world, this dissertation argues that reading literature provides a cognitive experience like John Gardner's "Fictive Dream" that mimics our interpretive experience of the world. Literary experience exploits language as an epistemological faculty that makes aspects of the external world intelligible. Yet the faculty of language is also capable of evoking entirely mental worlds that do not reflect the mindexternal world. Because the literary experience is entirely mindinternal, even the cultural knowledge we bring into play for its understanding still relies on innate features of language. Thus, during the act of reading, we hold this cultural knowledge in abeyance, allowing the text to structure how we bring it to bear on the experience as a whole.

ISBN: 9781369849134Subjects--Topical Terms:

570001
Comparative literature.

Foundations of a Scientific Cognitive Theory for Literary Criticism.
LDR:03252nmm a2200325 4500 001 2125227
005 20171113075202.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369849134
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10610481
035 $a AAI10610481
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bronsted, John C. $3 3287281
245 1 0 $a Foundations of a Scientific Cognitive Theory for Literary Criticism.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 117 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Prisca Augustyn.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2017.
520 $a Based on Noam Chomsky's argument that the faculty of language is primarily a tool of thought whose purpose is to interpret the world, this dissertation argues that reading literature provides a cognitive experience like John Gardner's "Fictive Dream" that mimics our interpretive experience of the world. Literary experience exploits language as an epistemological faculty that makes aspects of the external world intelligible. Yet the faculty of language is also capable of evoking entirely mental worlds that do not reflect the mindexternal world. Because the literary experience is entirely mindinternal, even the cultural knowledge we bring into play for its understanding still relies on innate features of language. Thus, during the act of reading, we hold this cultural knowledge in abeyance, allowing the text to structure how we bring it to bear on the experience as a whole.
520 $a A scientific approach to literature can help uncover principles to further elucidate the literaryepistemological experience. Whereas much literary criticism assumes that a critic's purpose is to mine a text for its deeper meaning, this dissertation argues for a Cognitive Formalist approach in which criticism serves not simply to explain the experience evoked by any particular text according to linguisticepistemological principles, but also to evaluate the moral implications of that specific textual experience.
520 $a As a means of demonstrating potential implications of a scientific cognitive approach to literary criticism based on linguisticepistemological understanding, the current study offers sample passages from J. R. R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings. These passages allow us to offer first approximations of some explanatory principles of the literaryepistemological experience, such as the importance of fictive time and fictional event sequences, which in turn gives us greater insight into how, for example, verb tense and aspect contribute to the evocation of the action of fiction in the reader's mind. Ultimately, the fictive vantage point constructed by the text allows the reader access to a complex moral framework in which fictive characters are understood to make choices that will in turn set the stage for the reader's own ethical reception of the text and the experience it offers.
590 $a School code: 0119.
650 4 $a Comparative literature. $3 570001
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
690 $a 0295
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a Florida Atlantic University. $b Comparative Studies. $3 2093907
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-10A(E).
790 $a 0119
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10610481