東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Explaining international responses t...

Arterberry, F. Wolfgang.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Explaining international responses to Russian action through the theory of complex interdependence: Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and Russo-Ukrainian Conflict of 2014- 2015.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Explaining international responses to Russian action through the theory of complex interdependence: Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and Russo-Ukrainian Conflict of 2014- 2015./
作者:	Arterberry, F. Wolfgang.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	110 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-01(E).
標題:	International relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1595488
ISBN:	9781321947649

Explaining international responses to Russian action through the theory of complex interdependence: Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and Russo-Ukrainian Conflict of 2014- 2015.
Arterberry, F. Wolfgang.

Explaining international responses to Russian action through the theory of complex interdependence: Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and Russo-Ukrainian Conflict of 2014- 2015. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 110 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.

Thesis (M.A.)--Saint Louis University, 2015.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Following the Russian annexation of the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine in the spring of 2014, the response from the international community was much harsher than would be expected from recent memory. Just six years prior, the Russian Federation found itself in open conflict with Georgia over similar separatist movements but with little effectual opposition from the international community. By employing an ordered logistical model and an actor specific qualitative examination, this study will seek to understand what levels of complex interdependence between Georgia, Ukraine, Russia and the rest of the international community affected each state's decision making during these two post-Cold War conflicts. My findings are that states that had significant levels of trade with Russia, and organizational associations with them, were most likely to support the Kremlin during both conflicts. States that had significant organizational associations with the United States and the West, and that were also robust democracies, were found to be most likely to denounce Russian actions in the Russo-Georgian War and sanction Russia during the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict. These findings suggest that complex interdependence does impact state decision making but not through interdependence with the victim state, except in a singular case. Instead, the findings presented a structure that more closely resembled the classic East-West divide of complex interdependencies for the vast majority of states.

ISBN: 9781321947649Subjects--Topical Terms:

531762
International relations.

Explaining international responses to Russian action through the theory of complex interdependence: Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and Russo-Ukrainian Conflict of 2014- 2015.
LDR:02613nmm a2200313 4500 001 2125023
005 20171103073801.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321947649
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1595488
035 $a AAI1595488
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Arterberry, F. Wolfgang. $3 3287063
245 1 0 $a Explaining international responses to Russian action through the theory of complex interdependence: Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and Russo-Ukrainian Conflict of 2014- 2015.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 110 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Adviser: Ellen H. Carnaghan.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Saint Louis University, 2015.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a Following the Russian annexation of the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine in the spring of 2014, the response from the international community was much harsher than would be expected from recent memory. Just six years prior, the Russian Federation found itself in open conflict with Georgia over similar separatist movements but with little effectual opposition from the international community. By employing an ordered logistical model and an actor specific qualitative examination, this study will seek to understand what levels of complex interdependence between Georgia, Ukraine, Russia and the rest of the international community affected each state's decision making during these two post-Cold War conflicts. My findings are that states that had significant levels of trade with Russia, and organizational associations with them, were most likely to support the Kremlin during both conflicts. States that had significant organizational associations with the United States and the West, and that were also robust democracies, were found to be most likely to denounce Russian actions in the Russo-Georgian War and sanction Russia during the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict. These findings suggest that complex interdependence does impact state decision making but not through interdependence with the victim state, except in a singular case. Instead, the findings presented a structure that more closely resembled the classic East-West divide of complex interdependencies for the vast majority of states.
590 $a School code: 0193.
650 4 $a International relations. $3 531762
650 4 $a Slavic studies. $3 3171903
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0614
710 2 $a Saint Louis University. $b Political Science. $3 3287064
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-01(E).
790 $a 0193
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1595488