語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Classroom Quality in the Age of Acco...
~
Foster, Brandon.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Classroom Quality in the Age of Accountability: Using a Comprehensive Multidimensional Rasch Approach to Investigate the Validity of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Classroom Quality in the Age of Accountability: Using a Comprehensive Multidimensional Rasch Approach to Investigate the Validity of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised./
作者:
Foster, Brandon.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:
198 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International78-10A(E).
標題:
Early childhood education. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10282401
ISBN:
9781369834673
Classroom Quality in the Age of Accountability: Using a Comprehensive Multidimensional Rasch Approach to Investigate the Validity of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised.
Foster, Brandon.
Classroom Quality in the Age of Accountability: Using a Comprehensive Multidimensional Rasch Approach to Investigate the Validity of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 198 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Tufts University, 2017.
The Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale--Revised (ECERS-R) is the most widely used measure of classroom quality, and has been implemented into numerous states' Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRISs). However, the ECERS-R was never designed for implementation into these systems or to be used for the purposes of accountability. As such, its validity for determining benchmarks on key indicators of classroom quality and suitability for identifying low or high performing preschools has yet to be established. Findings from a handful of validity studies which utilized classical test theory (CTT) have highlighted information pertaining to the factor structure of the measure. However, the CTT approach provides very limited diagnostic information about the functioning of the ECERS-R (e.g., Fan, 1998; Kieffer, 1998; Macdonald & Paunonen, 2002; Traub, 1997; Schumacker & Smith, 2007), and studies investigating the psychometric properties of the ECERS-R using more rigorous methods from item-response theory have hardly emerged (Gordon et al., 2013; 2015). This dissertation provides the first comprehensive account of the psychometric properties of the ECERS-R, utilizing the ECLS-B dataset, a nationally representative sample of early childhood environments. In particular, three proposed dimensional specifications of the measure that have emerged from the literature were examined. Psychometric analyses were carried out using Andrich Rating Scale Models and Multidimensional Random Coefficient Multinomial Logit (MRCML) models. To organize this information, this dissertation adopted Wolfe and Smith's (2007) Rasch validity framework, which ensured that analyses provided psychometric information about each component of Messick's seminal (1989) construct validity framework. Results illuminate the psychometric trade-offs that occur when different specifications of the ECERS-R are utilized to measure classroom quality. Additional information, which builds off the work of Gordon et al. (2013; 2015b), is provided to guide policymakers in the use of total scores from the measure in policy applications. Further, a promising new dimensional structure of the ECERS-R is posited and confirmed. Results from these analyses suggested that the ECERS-R functioned as a risk assessment, capable of precisely measuring classrooms with low levels of classroom quality, but functioned poorly for classrooms with average or above average levels of classroom quality. These results raise serious concerns about the use of the ECERS-R in most states' early-childhood assessment systems, and call into question some basic assumptions for how this measure is assumed to have performed in the prior research studies.
ISBN: 9781369834673Subjects--Topical Terms:
518817
Early childhood education.
Classroom Quality in the Age of Accountability: Using a Comprehensive Multidimensional Rasch Approach to Investigate the Validity of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised.
LDR
:03757nmm a2200301 4500
001
2124745
005
20171031101050.5
008
180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781369834673
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10282401
035
$a
AAI10282401
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Foster, Brandon.
$3
3286758
245
1 0
$a
Classroom Quality in the Age of Accountability: Using a Comprehensive Multidimensional Rasch Approach to Investigate the Validity of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2017
300
$a
198 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Christine McWayne.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Tufts University, 2017.
520
$a
The Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale--Revised (ECERS-R) is the most widely used measure of classroom quality, and has been implemented into numerous states' Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRISs). However, the ECERS-R was never designed for implementation into these systems or to be used for the purposes of accountability. As such, its validity for determining benchmarks on key indicators of classroom quality and suitability for identifying low or high performing preschools has yet to be established. Findings from a handful of validity studies which utilized classical test theory (CTT) have highlighted information pertaining to the factor structure of the measure. However, the CTT approach provides very limited diagnostic information about the functioning of the ECERS-R (e.g., Fan, 1998; Kieffer, 1998; Macdonald & Paunonen, 2002; Traub, 1997; Schumacker & Smith, 2007), and studies investigating the psychometric properties of the ECERS-R using more rigorous methods from item-response theory have hardly emerged (Gordon et al., 2013; 2015). This dissertation provides the first comprehensive account of the psychometric properties of the ECERS-R, utilizing the ECLS-B dataset, a nationally representative sample of early childhood environments. In particular, three proposed dimensional specifications of the measure that have emerged from the literature were examined. Psychometric analyses were carried out using Andrich Rating Scale Models and Multidimensional Random Coefficient Multinomial Logit (MRCML) models. To organize this information, this dissertation adopted Wolfe and Smith's (2007) Rasch validity framework, which ensured that analyses provided psychometric information about each component of Messick's seminal (1989) construct validity framework. Results illuminate the psychometric trade-offs that occur when different specifications of the ECERS-R are utilized to measure classroom quality. Additional information, which builds off the work of Gordon et al. (2013; 2015b), is provided to guide policymakers in the use of total scores from the measure in policy applications. Further, a promising new dimensional structure of the ECERS-R is posited and confirmed. Results from these analyses suggested that the ECERS-R functioned as a risk assessment, capable of precisely measuring classrooms with low levels of classroom quality, but functioned poorly for classrooms with average or above average levels of classroom quality. These results raise serious concerns about the use of the ECERS-R in most states' early-childhood assessment systems, and call into question some basic assumptions for how this measure is assumed to have performed in the prior research studies.
590
$a
School code: 0234.
650
4
$a
Early childhood education.
$3
518817
650
4
$a
Quantitative psychology.
$3
2144748
650
4
$a
Public policy.
$3
532803
690
$a
0518
690
$a
0632
690
$a
0630
710
2
$a
Tufts University.
$b
Child Development.
$3
1024814
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
78-10A(E).
790
$a
0234
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2017
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10282401
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9335357
電子資源
01.外借(書)_YB
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入