東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Are transformational leaders sustain...

Ran, Shan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Are transformational leaders sustainable? The role of organizational culture.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Are transformational leaders sustainable? The role of organizational culture./
作者:	Ran, Shan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	110 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-08B(E).
標題:	Occupational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10257693
ISBN:	9781369687507

Are transformational leaders sustainable? The role of organizational culture.
Ran, Shan.

Are transformational leaders sustainable? The role of organizational culture. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 110 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2017.

As the workplace becomes increasingly stressful, leaders' well-being, a critical determinant for follower well-being and organizational effectiveness, rises as an important research direction. Under the theoretical framework of self-regulation and conservation of resources, the current study hypothesized that transformational leadership deters leaders' affective and cognitive resources from long-term self-growth, resulting in a detrimental effect on leaders' eudemonic well-being. In addition, organizational culture was hypothesized to moderate the overall negative relationship between transformational behaviors and well-being of the leaders. On the one hand, mastery-approach norms would facilitate restoration of resources, so the association between transformational leadership and well-being becomes positive under a high level of mastery-approach norms. On the other hand, performance-approach and avoid norms would prevent resource gain and exacerbate the negative effect of transformational behaviors on leaders' well-being.

ISBN: 9781369687507Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122852
Occupational psychology.

Are transformational leaders sustainable? The role of organizational culture.
LDR:03536nmm a2200313 4500 001 2124670
005 20171031101043.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369687507
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10257693
035 $a AAI10257693
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ran, Shan. $3 3286676
245 1 0 $a Are transformational leaders sustainable? The role of organizational culture.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 110 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Marcus W. Dickson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2017.
520 $a As the workplace becomes increasingly stressful, leaders' well-being, a critical determinant for follower well-being and organizational effectiveness, rises as an important research direction. Under the theoretical framework of self-regulation and conservation of resources, the current study hypothesized that transformational leadership deters leaders' affective and cognitive resources from long-term self-growth, resulting in a detrimental effect on leaders' eudemonic well-being. In addition, organizational culture was hypothesized to moderate the overall negative relationship between transformational behaviors and well-being of the leaders. On the one hand, mastery-approach norms would facilitate restoration of resources, so the association between transformational leadership and well-being becomes positive under a high level of mastery-approach norms. On the other hand, performance-approach and avoid norms would prevent resource gain and exacerbate the negative effect of transformational behaviors on leaders' well-being.
520 $a To test these hypotheses, an empirical study was conducted using a multi-organizational archival dataset, which contains others' ratings of transformational leadership and leaders' well-being, as well as employee responses to measurements of organizational culture. These measures were extracted from the Leadership/ImpactRTM (L/I) and Organizational Culture InventoryRTM (OCIRTM) published by Human Synergistics International. Given sufficient interrater reliability and agreement, data were aggregated to the leader and organizational levels. Regression and hierarchical linear modeling was used for analyzing the aggregated data.
520 $a Results supported the main effect hypothesis that transformational leadership was negatively related to leaders' eudemonic well-being when controlling for transactional leadership. Results were inconclusive about the cross-level interactions, such that organizational culture, conceptualized as the collective self-regulatory focus, did not significantly moderate the main effect at the leader level, but statistical power was lacking to reveal the potential interactions. These findings are helpful for understanding long-term sustainability of effective leadership. Regardless of organizational context, leaders and organizations need to be aware of and balance the contradiction between effective leadership and leaders' personal development and fulfillment. Future research should continue incorporating leaders' well-being for exploring the within-leader processes associated with the dynamic nature of leadership.
590 $a School code: 0254.
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 2122852
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Wayne State University. $b Psychology. $3 1019401
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-08B(E).
790 $a 0254
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10257693