東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The States, the Supreme Court, and S...

Gradecki, Kaitlyn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The States, the Supreme Court, and Social Change: An Analysis of Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The States, the Supreme Court, and Social Change: An Analysis of Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges./
作者:	Gradecki, Kaitlyn.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	64 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-05(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10267296
ISBN:	9781369886535

The States, the Supreme Court, and Social Change: An Analysis of Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges.
Gradecki, Kaitlyn.

The States, the Supreme Court, and Social Change: An Analysis of Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 64 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.

Thesis (M.A.)--Northern Illinois University, 2017.

This study analyzes when and under what conditions the Supreme Court can produce lasting social change. By re-examine Gerald Rosenberg's theory and finding that the Court is too constitutionally constrained to produce change, I argue that the Supreme Court can establish lasting social change. Lasting social change is established through landmark rulings on substantive rights when those issues first have the time to percolate in the states and build the public support necessary to implement the Court's ruling. To test this theory, I analyze two landmark Court rulings. First, I examine the right to abortion in Roe v. Wade (1973) where the Supreme Court lead the constitutional debate, and second the right to same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) as a counterfactual, as the Supreme Court ruling followed the constitutional debate. These cases are analyzed in conjunction with public opinion trends to understand how state constitutional debate contributes to public approval of the right at issue. Based on the analysis, the Supreme Court can establish lasting social change when handing down landmark rulings after the constitutional and political debate has already occurred at the state level.

ISBN: 9781369886535Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

The States, the Supreme Court, and Social Change: An Analysis of Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges.
LDR:02172nmm a2200313 4500 001 2124268
005 20171023115426.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369886535
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10267296
035 $a AAI10267296
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gradecki, Kaitlyn. $3 3286257
245 1 4 $a The States, the Supreme Court, and Social Change: An Analysis of Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 64 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.
500 $a Adviser: J. Mitch Pickerill.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Northern Illinois University, 2017.
520 $a This study analyzes when and under what conditions the Supreme Court can produce lasting social change. By re-examine Gerald Rosenberg's theory and finding that the Court is too constitutionally constrained to produce change, I argue that the Supreme Court can establish lasting social change. Lasting social change is established through landmark rulings on substantive rights when those issues first have the time to percolate in the states and build the public support necessary to implement the Court's ruling. To test this theory, I analyze two landmark Court rulings. First, I examine the right to abortion in Roe v. Wade (1973) where the Supreme Court lead the constitutional debate, and second the right to same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) as a counterfactual, as the Supreme Court ruling followed the constitutional debate. These cases are analyzed in conjunction with public opinion trends to understand how state constitutional debate contributes to public approval of the right at issue. Based on the analysis, the Supreme Court can establish lasting social change when handing down landmark rulings after the constitutional and political debate has already occurred at the state level.
590 $a School code: 0162.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a American studies. $3 2122720
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0323
710 2 $a Northern Illinois University. $b Political Science. $3 1020333
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-05(E).
790 $a 0162
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10267296